this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
658 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2651 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On Wednesday evening, a rifle-toting gunman murdered 18 people and wounded at least 13 more in Lewiston, Maine, when he opened fire at two separate locations—a bowling alley, followed by a bar. A manhunt is still underway for 40-year-old suspect Robert Card, a trained firearms instructor with the U.S. Army Reserve who, just this summer, spent two weeks in a mental hospital after reporting that he was hearing voices and threatening to shoot up a military base.

While the other late-night talk show hosts stuck to poking fun at new Speaker of the House Mike Johnson on Thursday night, Stephen Colbert took his rebuke of the Louisiana congressman to a whole other level.

“Now, we know the arguments,” Colbert said of the do-nothing response politicians generally have to tragedies such as this. “Some people are going to say this is a mental health issue. Others are going to say it’s a gun issue. But there’s no reason it can’t be both.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 93 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I gave up after Sandy Hook. If the population can't prevent assault weapons from being sold after such a gun butchers children, then they won't make their representatives do anything that makes a difference. You have to fix it someday, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The year of Sandy Hook, the gun lobby increased their "donations" to Republicans from $8 million to $16 million per year, where it remains to this day.

Also, be wary of saying "assault weapons" as it's vague and used by the pro-gun crowd to undermine discussion -- semi-automatic guns are the weapon of choice for criminals, terrorists and domestic abusers and are not necessary for hunting nor hobby shooting.

It's why they're strictly controlled in most countries.

[–] rchive@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Calls for gun prohibition just increase funding for Republicans.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh God the only time fascists start wanting to be a grammar Nazi.

It's semi automatic weapons. Just because you can switch out one pin to make it full auto means nothing.

It's a magazine not a clip!

Just like every word in the world, they're all made up and become defined by the culture using them.

If I say assault weapons and you understand what I mean, then the word is fine.

Once you get into the legal areas, absolutely everything needs to be defined. Under assault weapon it'll start listing every type and parameter with strict definitions of what they mean. They like to pretend that's not part of the bill though lol.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

However, there are farm rifles that have been semi-automatic for many decades, such as the mini-14. Also my Ruger 10/22 is an auto loading semi-automatic rifle.

Neither of these would be considered an assault rifle as they do not have a pistol grip.

I think that we should just allow these types of weapons under a owner's permit, and then make sure that people take a basic training course, mental health and background checks, and make them liable for any harm that may cause through their ownership or negligence with these weapons.

I should also make it way harder to get a concealed weapons permit and restrict pistols more than rifles as most gun shootings are with pistols.

This is similar how Austria approaches gun ownership which in some ways is more lax than the US (they allow suppressors for instance).

Unfortunately rational discourse around gun laws in this country just simply does not happen. People are not motivated for change around these laws if they're not motivated by emotional response.

🤪🔫⚖️

Yep it's been proven time and time again that the vast majority of all Americans, republican voters included, want gun legislation.

Unfortunately every elected Republican feels beholden to their fascist base. Most of the elected are the fascist too. However so many of voters are single issue and want to stick their head in the sand to keep their 401k from dropping lmfao. It's right fucked to everyone who sees it but they pretend like they aren't enabling their shitbag cohorts.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that the "assault weapon" wording makes it easier for pro gun to dismiss you. The US has a lot of people obsessed with guns. I'd love if the US could just ban guns entirely, but reality is that we'd have to at least start with reasonable baby steps and cannot give them any easy way to get out. By using the "assault weapon" wording, you're just making it easier for them to dismiss gun legislation cause they'll claim "it's too vague" (even if it's not).

It's unfortunate that wording has to matter so much, especially in colloquial usage, but it's such an uphill battle to get even the slightest gun restrictions in place, so we sadly do need to be perfect. And yeah, it's stupid. It's dumb that the US can be like it is and people will still defend their guns to the death. But we have to account for that if we want to make anything better.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

If they're dismissive, they would never support it anyway. Don't cater to people who won't support you no matter what you do.

[–] uberkalden@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Exactly. That was the moment and it passed. It would take something so extreme it's hard to even fathom. Actually, maybe it's as simple as the left taking up arms and starting militias similar to the right.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Within days of Sandy Hook, an ex friend of mine showed me footage he saw on Alex Jones throwing questions into if they weren't all actors. People will go to ridiculous levels of hypocrisy or mental blindness to ensure they don't have to actually assess their values and beliefs.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Isn't Alex Jones still claiming that Sandy Hook is a false flag by fake actors?

And didn't he just lose a billion dollar lawsuit?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Everyone talks about assault weapons and mad shootings and ignores the vast majority of gun homicides.

All types of rifles combined make up 3% of homicides, and just about 1% of firearm deaths (handgun suicides are about 2/3rd of gun deaths).

That's the reason the Dems didn't really care when the AWB expired in the 2000s. Every single objective study of homicide rates, gun murder rates, and mass shootings showed no statically-significant impact of the AWB.

The real danger was easy, cheap access to handguns. A $1000 rifle that's hard to conceal isn't nearly as dangerous as a $200 handgun that can hold just as much ammunition and be easily concealed.

But after DC v Heller, it became clear that handgun ban wasn't going to be possible, so the focus switched back to black rifles.

We have a lot of broken gun laws in this country, but I'm much more concerned with cheap zinc handguns designed to be disposable than I am an AR-15.