this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
148 points (98.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7162 readers
650 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This court case isn't about automatic firearms it's about semiautomatic firearms that exhibit listed features.

This particular rulling also is only about if the law should be enforced while a the trial regarding it's constitutionality ensues.

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Then the headline is wrong because semi-auto firearms are not federally defined as assault weapons.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They're operating off of the CA definition in the headline.

To the best of my knowledge the only federal definition of the phrase 'assault weapon' came from the 1994 ban which ceased in 2004. And that targeted semiautomatic guns too as it was based off of California's.

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Thank you for the correction. I am dumb

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No problem, we all have our moments.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

They just like fucking with definitions.