this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
33 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

7226 readers
567 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The OHRC said while caste is not a prescribed protected category, it is covered by international human rights law and hence, can be protected under the Ontario Human Rights Code.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Having to explicitly define every protected category in law seems ridiculous. Surely a description of what a protected category looks like would be more consistent and future proof.

[–] totallynotarobot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If "don't be an asshole" worked, we wouldn't need most of the rest of the laws. Sadly it doesn't. I don't quite understand why.

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because there is no consensus on what an "asshole" is.

"I'm not an asshole; I just tell it like it is." β€” some asshole somewhere every five minutes

Yeah. You're absolutely right. But it's fun to pretend we could all be reasonable together.

[–] Cory_t_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They're created this way on purpose, to leave room for hating people in the future we might not know we hate yet. That's the type of "future proof" we're after, right?

[–] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Stupid rules are created because of stupid people.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If I'm not mistaken, there are general descriptions too, so I don't think the list is exclusive. I think it's a good idea to specify what categories you can so that in future human rights challenges, you don't have various interested groups trying to argue differing interpretations. Interpretations of vague language can vary and this can tend to lead us away from the spirit of an otherwise good law.