internet funeral

6912 readers

1 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

• !hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

fucker@lemmy.world

FUCKER@lemmy.dbzer0.com

FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz

1270

↷󠁿󠁿 (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by fucker@lemmy.world to c/internetfuneral@lemmy.world

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That seems like a tricky one to moderate. I’m sure they are worried about things being set and forgotten and never repealed.

[–] registrert@lemmy.sambands.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand why, but I also have examples of compromises;

Set a marker, it expires after a certain timeperiod. Users "validate" that the hindrance is still there, resetting the timer.
Set a marker, "Hindrance here at 2023-11-03"
- "Expected end"
- - Today
- - This week
- - This month
- - Later (Marked hindrance disappear some time after "Expected end" if no users validate that it's still there, with new "Expected end".

Just some thoughts.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That does seem like a good system for structuring things for users with good intent.

[–] registrert@lemmy.sambands.net 5 points 1 year ago

users with good intent

Oh right, it could easily be abused by traffic trolls. Didn't cross my mind, sometimes my faith in other people are unreasonably high.

Perhaps some sort of validation system, if two users report the same temporary hindrance? TBH I can't be bothered to work out a fool-proof system for a hypothetical solution I doubt will ever be implemented hah.