Greentext

4482 readers

1575 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

494

Anon finds a plot hole (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, how much had technology advanced in the 5000 years before the Roman Empire?

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot actually if you really compare the technologies, also the romans could haveeasily beat any army 5 times their size from 5000 years before.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

You don't even need 5000 years. Colonial forces regularly beat 10:1 odds against natives, and they very obviously lived at the same time. The battle of Ulundi saw the british win with 20 deaths, against a force of 15.000 Zulu warriors. Even the famous British defeat at Islandlwana saw the Zulu impi suffer tripple the British casualties.