1498
submitted 2 years ago by Pips@lemmy.sdf.org to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 100 points 2 years ago

As a Michigander this is physically painful to say... but you done good Ohio.

[-] nick@midwest.social 15 points 2 years ago

We did. And it pains me to say too. But we did.

[-] evulhotdog@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Michigan won’t be flying as high anymore on Ohioan’s dollars for marijuana, either!

[-] roboticide@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

For at least a couple more years we will. It took us a bit to set up our system. Probably will take you a couple as well. Takes time to build a distribution network too, since you can't really import it from growers in other states, so for a while ours will probably be cheaper.

But it's still a huge win and it's better for us all to have more states legalize it. And in the meantime we can just both suck Indiana dry of marijuana money.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Well you still have a legislature that has to put the laws into place and setup the system. I bet they do everything they can to slow it down.

[-] bmsok@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Good job, Ohio. Despite our strange relationship I'll call this one a win for everyone.

https://youtu.be/oZzgAjjuqZM?si=FtAw4hVXrEJiOand

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

As a Hoosier, this is mentally and physically painful to say but... please help us!

[-] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thank you, genuinely! I know there's a lot of bad blood but Michigan is stunning and my last few visits have been spectacular (yes even before any cannabis).

I hope you all can find the beauty in Ohio too. I recommend Kelly's Island for the glacial grooves. Also the Cleveland Metroparks; there's a good reason it was once called the Forest City.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1498 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31132 readers
3791 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS