this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1457 points (97.7% liked)

Antiwork

3648 readers
2 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lieuwestra@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Skilled labor is economists jargon, so the meaning of it does not match the dictionary definition.

No one is saying there is literally no skill involved in unskilled labor.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Skilled labor = real human deserving of a fair wage.

Unskilled labor = meat machine that we need to pay by law, but we gladly wouldn't pay them a dime if we could get away with it because they aren't real people.

-Asshat Owners

[–] lieuwestra@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Technically skilled as in requiring education (financed by the state), unskilled can learn on the job within days.

But politics has a way with twisting those words into a us/them dichotomy.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For me it's not really an us/them opposition, my disgust is with how unskilled laborers are viewed/treated because of our lack of education. That somehow makes us subhuman and undeserving of a living wage. That we should be thankful for a minimum wage.

I have no issue with skilled laborers, I have an issue with owners/CEO/etc... us laborers of all skills are in the same boat. Best friend works for Intel, Intel makes tons of money, friend gets pay cut and added responsibility. ¿Que?

[–] lieuwestra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The problem lies in the fact that we need to categorise these subjects to write more effective policy. And it doesn't matter what words you use, they always get these connotations as familiarity grows.

[–] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

To add to this, the whole education level dictates importance thing never made sense to me anyways. I may see a doctor once or twice a year, but I need garbage collected every week. On the level of social importance it strike me then that the garbage person is therefor more important than a doctor.

[–] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I think its unintended but by that definition then carpentry or other trades which used to be learned by apprenticeship on the job aren't skilled?

[–] mayoi@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Education requires no skill, you just kiss professor's ass and do as you're told, your reward is a diploma. Here, is that reductionist enough for you?

By the way, cashier job can't be learned within days, you need to be literate and know at least basic math and average kid goes to school for at least 8 years so fuck you. I can't even think of a job that requires no education.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Some more sarcasm and condescension

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What constitutes skilled labor and who should be paid a living wage are two distinct conversations.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is it made less difficult to achieve a living wage for everyone by affirming, or by challenging, the practice of characterizing some labor as "unskilled"?

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What it does it make you sound like a dunce for pretending like there aren't many many jobs that require special skills.

What you're doing is applying manipulative tactics and blatantly lying to further an agenda rather than just applying simple logic and reason. When you do that, you inhibit the cause you claim to support.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You seem to be inserting an appeal to purity, by characterizing certain skills as "special".

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An appeal to purity is not good, in case you are not aware if the term.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe you should try some of that logic and reason I was speaking about earlier rather than pointing to Wikipedia articles you don't understand and pretending like it makes you right.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I asked you a particular question, and you have since returned only hostility and insultation.

Do you have any contribution relating to the question I asked, or to the concern that it carries no particular meaning merely to assert that some skills may be given the characterization "special"?

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The only question you asked of me, I answered plainly and in no uncertain terms, even though it's the wrong question.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I asked you a question, which you may easily find earlier in the thread, and your response was of deflection and insultation.

Do you have any contribution that is thoughtful and constructive?

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're just going to keep reposting the same comment, I'm not going to continue engaging with you.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You have not engaged, only deflected.

What comment have I reposted?

I only asked that you move beyond insults.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure. To the economist the terms are jargon, but to the bootlicker they are sacred words. Your heresy is unwelcome.