this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1457 points (97.7% liked)

Antiwork

3648 readers
2 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library πŸ“š
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format β€œOriginal title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Packing boxes at Amazon is skilled labor?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)

All labor is skilled labor, but packing boxes sure as shit isn't more skill than a short order cook.

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'll do you one in reverse: all labor can be represented in the unskilled labor required to recreate it. If unskilled labor is x, and skilled labor is 2x, skilled is just a higher quantity of unskilled labor as expressed per hour.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you are saying they are actually interchangeable in that way, but employers think like this and will hire multiple 'unskilled' people to do a job that would take one 'skilled' person. In reality the work done by unskilled people will not be the same as the skilled person.

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, skilled labor isn't normally represented in multiple people selling unskilled labor, but rather the unskilled labor of training and whatnot.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. Because that is assuming that all work has more primitive forms that are still extent. There really isn't a market for unskilled heart surgery. Lots of work is binary, you can and should do it, or you can't and should definitely not try.

The model you are advocating is a gross simplification that wouldn't even be applicable to basic machine parts.

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you're grossly misinterpreting what I'm saying.

Heart Surgery is represented as the condensed unskilled labor of decades of experience before even being able to perform one. All of that training requires decades of hard training to replicate.

I'm not implying that you can get 40 dudes with no training to do heart surgery together.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How would that even work? Who is training the surgeon? Where does the unskilled labor go, does it hover about the person like a spirit?

Maybe humans are more complicated than "well since this guy has a CPR cert his labor is 1.2x the person without".

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're still thinking of it in completely the wrong way. All skilled labor is, is unskilled labor for training, and current labor. Nobody gives a shit who trained who, or where it magically needs to hang.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fine. Skills + labor = skilled labor.

Are you studying to be an economist or something?

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Almost. Labor + labor = skilled labor, as skills are just embodied labor.

No, I'm not studying to become an economist, but I am familiar with economics.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again this makes no sense. You just admitted that throwing random people at a problem doesn't mean they know how to fix it.

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're again missing the entire point.

Training is unskilled labor. The value of skilled labor represents the time it took to train for said labor. It doesn't mean you can throw bodies at a skilled problem.

If you're missing the point this badly, I don't think you'll ever get it.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the value of skilled labor was equal to the time it took to train there would not be situations where someone was screwed or blessed. My kids teachers have masters degrees I only have a 4-year degree in engineering. Guess who makes more money?

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You're still not quite right, value and price are not the same. Price is influenced by supply and demand, value is not.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think the observation is that little or no broad difference emerges between training for providing skilled labor, versus simply providing labor that may be considered as unskilled. In either case, one provides labor, with or without the intention of developing skill, but certainly converging toward such an effect.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

You clearly haven't seen me at work.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every skill is different from others qualitatively, not ranked hierarchically, one above or below another.

[–] canni@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

My skill is shitting in a corner, I've practiced and I'm very good at it, and I don't want no electricity scientists saying they're better than me goddammit.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both are just following instructions. I just put a fry cook slightly higher because a mistake on their part could burn the building down. A box filler, not so much.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

May I hold a box packer in higher regard, because of all the days I would lose from being shipped the wrong item, or would I be missing the concerns of broader relevance?

[–] Stuka@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but calling any position a cook at McDonald's is uhh...generous.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"food assembly position" is more like it

[–] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

that's most chain restaurant kitchens though...

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Don't let that question distract you from how he illustrates her point: the capitalists get away with exploitation by distracting workers into fighting among ourselves. It's so easy for them: even in this thread everyone sails right past this main point into arguing about whether an Amazon warehouse worker or a McDonald's cook should earn more.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So what's the reason that I don't have to work as an Amazon warehouse dude or McDonald's cook? I'm not really a capitalist, 95% of my income comes from my work.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I don't quite see the relevance of your question. People can do different jobs. We don't need to fight with one another about them, when the real significant inequality is between what employees receive versus those who cream the value off the top.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would add, though, the deeper observation, that among the means of imposing division is the constructed distinction and terminology embodied by "unskilled labor".

The concern for workers is not which worker belongs in which category, nor even which categories should be given and how they should be named, but rather, how to challenge both the distinction and also the processes and conditions from which it emerges.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

2023, words mean anything you want them to mean and the only thing that is real is our outrage. That's why a cardiologist is just as skilled as someone stacking boxes.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The meanings of terms are often determined and enforced socially through particular systems that carry power in society.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Sure as hell is if the company needs it to happen