this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
1259 points (82.8% liked)

Memes

45726 readers
985 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No need to refute Marx, reality has already proven time and time again that communism doesn't work in practice.

Btw your argument only applies to "pure" capitalism, without any government interference. Homelessness is not really an issue in many European countries.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean the reality where every 1st world nation on the planet did everything in their power to keep Communism from working. Bahahaha

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't take much to stop a system dreamed up by idealists and idiots from working. The very concept is flawed.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Tell me you haven’t read Marx without telling me you haven’t read Marx.

Seriously though, Marx is like the guy you go read if you want a ruthless critique of idealism. I’d go so far as to say it’s the reason his theories became so popular in the first place.

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who cared about Marx? He wrote a book. He didn't lead a country. Nobody cares about theories when they don't hold up in practice. And they never have.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

You’re right, nobody has ever cared about Marx. No communist revolutionaries anywhere have ever called themselves Marxists. If they did, then their projects must have surely collapsed by now. That’s because Marx was very clear that his political theories were not made to be adaptable or revisable based on new information and changing conditions. No, that would be far too scientific for someone we can agree was clearly an idealist.