politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
If she's good enough for a Biden she's good enough for me.
Have you seen the other guy? He's talking about instituting martial law on day one, posting armed guards at election sites, purging the federal government, and eradicating political opponents.
The dude already trying to steal a four-year term as president even though he knew he lost the election. If he's elected, he will 100% make himself a dictator for life.
IMO, he has inspired more terrorism in the United States than Osama Bin Laden ever did.
Yes, I have seen the other guy.
Which is why I'm quite concerned that an octogenarian with an unpopular VP who floundered during the primary race and has barely been seen since may not be making it to election day 2024 and passing the torch prematurely at the 11th hour during the most important election cycle in US history.
Biden is acting like a teenager that thinks they are immortal and risking the entire country on that presumption.
We should really be having a primary to run the most capable Dem candidates against Trump. But short of that, they should at very least be adequately preparing for a possible Harris v Trump ticket and not keep pretending she doesn't exist until she's unexpectedly thrust into the spotlight again.
"Barely been seen."
Check the White House calendar. Where did you hear this hot take because it's obviously a lie. The rest of your opinion seems equally as misinformed.
I'm not talking about hosting a lunch, and you know it.
I'm talking about national media presence.
It's not her fault, but she's significantly less visible than past VPs in both online media coverage and her own party's preferred TV news segments.
I'm saying that it would be wise to have the party prioritize changing that quickly given the odds around how things might play out over the next twelve months.
Especially given things like the recent NBC News poll where she had the lowest approval rating since the poll began in 1989, articles like this NY Mag piece, or this WP piece, etc.
This is a PR issue, and it really seems like the party/administration is just pretending it doesn't exist and focusing 100% on Biden rather than investing into improving her national image when there's a real chance she's going to need to carry a victory against Trump home unless they replace her (which Biden won't do).
While I agree with your "Have you seen the other guy?", I can also disagree with Harris.
Sure. I disagree with Biden and Harris all the time. That's what it means to have principles. You're principled. Congrats!
It's why the DNC is so hard to steer and often why Democrats lose elections. Speaking our truths and working together despite disagreement is our only hope.
Have you seen the other guys? They are always in agreement. They are unprincipled. As a result, there is no lie they aren't too gullible to believe and no atrocity too horrible they can't be tricked to commit.
This is what happens when your political role models are all authoritarians.
But blaming others for this is not really accurate. Trump was raised to be a POS from birth.
No doubt. Long line of stunted dumbasses with money.
Sure, but the problem is that presidential elections are determined by who inspires more of their supporters to actually show up.
No one is inspired by "not literally the worst person to run for president".