521
submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Last year, I wrote a great deal about the rise of “ventilation shutdown plus” (VSD+), a method being used to mass kill poultry birds on factory farms by sealing off the airflow inside barns and pumping in extreme heat using industrial-scale heaters, so that the animals die of heatstroke over the course of hours. It is one of the worst forms of cruelty being inflicted on animals in the US food system — the equivalent of roasting animals to death — and it’s been used to kill tens of millions of poultry birds during the current avian flu outbreak.

As of this summer, the most recent period for which data is available, more than 49 million birds, or over 80 percent of the depopulated total, were killed in culls that used VSD+ either alone or in combination with other methods, according to an analysis of USDA data by Gwendolen Reyes-Illg, a veterinary adviser to the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), an animal advocacy nonprofit. These mass killings, or “depopulations,” in the industry’s jargon, are paid for with public dollars through a USDA program that compensates livestock farmers for their losses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 years ago

So you'll put your money where your mouth is and stop buying chicken then right? That's how condemnation works.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No it’s not, you’re confusing condemnation with boycott

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I raise my own chickens. I love them very much. Some of them get eaten. I am very grateful to those. You don’t have to be a vegan to be a good person.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

In their eyes you do.

Also a backyard chicken owner. My ladies live well

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

You don't necessarily have to be vegan to be a good person. I'm sure your chickens wouldn't miss an egg or two every once in a while. It is pretty fucked up to claim that you love them, but also kill and eat them sometimes. Like, I love my cat, and because of that the idea of putting her dead body in my mouth makes me feel sick.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

"I love my chickens so much that I kill and eat them sometimes"

Remind me not to let you watch my dogs

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Wow. I’m really fucking floored by y’all’s response. Where do you think your food comes from man? Seriously. I’m not being ugly, like you are, im trying to understand how you feel like you have less impact than I do. I am just able to take the responsibility for my own food

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

My food comes primarily from farms. I'm not saying I necessarily have less of an impact on anything than you, all I'm saying is that I don't kill animals for food and I don't pay for them to be killed.

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You mocked me, man. It only hurts in the super small space that internet strangers can reach but it exists, regardless of how small. So. Bullshit.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I pointed out some cognitive dissonance. I care a little bit more about random animals' lives than I do about random internet strangers' feelings.

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

And while we are talking about cognitive dissonance, where the fuck do you think YOUR food comes from?

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I already said farms. Who's the dumb fuck here?

Go kill some more chickens and then claim to love them. Or maybe stop pretending you care about animals

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Are you trolling me? Lol. I feel like im in the other end of some joke

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I was being sarcastic you dumb fuck.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You should consider that the only way you will convince people to care more about random animals' lives is if you care about strangers' feelings. You don't change minds by attacking someone, whether it be a personal attack or a lifestyle one.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

If it makes you feel bad when people tell you that killing animals is wrong, then you should look into not killing animals. How am I supposed to try to convince you to stop eating meat if I have to set my morals aside and say "actually there's nothing really wrong with eating meat, and you shouldn't feel bad at all about it?"

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

You're really missing the point, so I'm just going to let it go now. The amusing thing is that we're on the same side, but you do fall into that latter group I described.

How are you supposed to win new friends when you turn off people who are already on your side? You need to look into your tactics if you want to be effective. I'm sure you disagree, but I would really encourage you to think about it.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah lemme make good close friends with some random on the internet, and see if I can convince them not to eat meat based not on any arguments about morality or anything like that, but just by being nice about the fact that they kill and eat animals and don't feel bad about it

All we need to do is support our local slaughterers and never make them think about whether what they're doing is actually harmful, that'll really make them start to think about whether what they're doing is actually harmful 🥰

Nah, I'm gonna be an asshole to someone who's being an asshole

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Wtf? What are you eating? Please tell me. I’ve gotte paragraphs of bullshit but nothing else.

[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

How am I supposed to try to convince you to stop eating meat if I have to set my morals aside and say insert opposing opinion

You have to do this basically every time you want to convince someone, occupying their position better than they can occupy it themselves and still coming out with the correct opinion is part of being empathetic and mature. There's not really any inherent or objective morality to whether or not raising and then killing your own chickens is good or not. Someone who's really invested in the concept of ownership as a specific right is really not going to care about your own moral code of infringing on the chicken's right to not be killed randomly. They're just going to say that it's their right to kill their chicken, and that's that. It obviously has to become bigger than that, you have to give alternatives, spell out why their ideological position doesn't really work out at scale, give out alternative perspectives, you have to be intellectually honest and give them ground when they push back.

If you just kind of, resorting to occupying your own position forever, and then calling out other people that violate that position, then you're just gonna be kind of blindly hitting other people for reasons that they don't fully understand, like what happens on the internet constantly. It's maybe more self-affirming to be someone else's ideological landmine, but I think it's probably harmful overall, because it's a selfish short-term gain that doesn't see the bigger picture. It prioritizes your own self-affirmation over someone else's ability to be emotionally vulnerable and open to new ideas. Your own morals should probably not preclude you from being nice to people that you see as bad or evil or dicks. But then that's just my two cents, I dunno.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago

Where the fuck do you think meat comes from? Farms.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago
[-] Drusas@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm genuinely confused about your comment. Why is it relevant that some farms produce meat? I don't buy meat that's produced at farms.

Are you suggesting that, because meat also comes from farms, buying meat is the exact same thing as buying vegetables from farms?

[-] Drusas@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago

Because you made it a high horse statement to say that your food comes from farms. As though meat doesn't also come from farms.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This website, man, y'all are incapable of having a normal conversation. I didn't say it like it was some moral high ground that my food comes from farms, I answered the question they asked.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You might want to consider that 1) this is the internet and tone does not carry over well and 2) almost all vegans who are vocal about being vegan are really pushy and holier-than-thou about it.

If you are not one of the latter, then thank you. But it doesn't convey well on the internet and that is how it comes across.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago
[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Yes. I do. I have a separate small flock. I feed my family a proportion of our food over half that I grow, rise, and make myself. It would be impossible with out the protein from the chickens. And before anyone says some dumb shit to me, you do the math of your monoculture grown vegan food and if you still think my overall footprint is greater than yours, you are wrong.

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I get my chicken (and beef) from small, local neighboring farms, directly. I don't see the problem?

[-] triangle5106@reddthat.com -1 points 2 years ago

If your question is genuine, these small farms you speak of are still breeding animals with intent to slaughter them. At the end of the day, the only meaningful difference with a small farm is that you can probably shake the hand of the person who needlessly killed an animal. Can't get that at those big mean factory farms, that's for sure.

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

intent to slaughter them

Assuming that's the intent is an asshole move. What if the primary intent is to extract nutrition from land that is otherwise unproductive?

[-] triangle5106@reddthat.com 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is it not the intent? A farmer generally isn't going to raise an animal for fun. That wouldn't be profitable, and small farms are already difficult to make a living on.

I can entertain the idea that I could walk up to a farmer and ask them what their intent is, and they reply, "why it's to extract nutrition from land that is otherwise unproductive, of course!". But the end result is the same in either case regardless of stated intent: animals are being killed unnecessarily.

To be clear, none of this applies to people who rely on animal products to survive (e.g. people in the unproductive land you mentioned). I'm talking about people like myself (and likely many others here) who have access to supermarkets and other products of a globalized food system. Like Uncle Ben said, with great ~~power~~ privilege comes great responsibility.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago

Land has more value than economic activity, such as natural habitat and biodiversity and recreation (all things farmers destroy lol)

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

And yet, you couldn't resist the temptation to be aggressive and further turn off people to the idea of going meat free, vs trying to kindly convince them.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

These sort of vegan evangelists have no idea the damage they do to their cause.

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

That's hilarious, people have no sense of personal responsibility whatsoever. Just look at COVID.

They use the argument that one person not eating meat won't change anything. Ignoring the fact that they are literally deriving joy from suffering. It doesn't have to be this way. I truly believe meat can be ethical, but when 99.8% of beef is factory farmed I do not have the option to ethically eat meat.

17 years meat free and every once in awhile I reconsider adding chicken to my diet. Then I see a post like this lol

[-] triangle5106@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago

I think ethical meat can only truly exist in theory (though with cell culture meat I suspect that that will change).

Anyway, I just wanted to say 17 years is a long time. Thanks for walking the talk. Not many people do.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago

Some of us instead reduce consumption and buy expensive meat products which are locally and humanely raised.

[-] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Still, eating meat in today's society is a choice you don't have to make. Having a pleasant taste in your mouth on one hand versus climate warming, loss of biodiversity and animal cruelty. Even when locally grown. For me, the choice is not hard to make.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
521 points (94.8% liked)

News

39318 readers
2520 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS