this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

515 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey Guys, My mum is doing semi professional photography and I am at my wits end. It’s a human and technological problem. I did a quick object count she has like 70k photos roughly 4tb. This happens because she takes every picture in raw and JPEG and a lot of series captures. The begin of the story is that she had at first a ssd, then a second, then a third and so on. I already bought a synology nas. And threw everything at it. But everything is messy and unsorted and she is not happy because she doesn’t get her chaos together and adobe Lightroom performs bad with network drives, and I don’t get why … but this seems to be a known problem… Anyways she uses Lightroom for her editing which is nice, but she is using more like a library and not to perform the actual changes, that’s the reason that the catalogue which is a db of the changes is a 17 gb.

She is not happy at the current state. Do you have suggestions, for a strategy to clear this chaos ? Or a cool tool for getting a folder structure? Maybe any tips and tricks for synology and network stuff ?

I Already tried to move files and get a structure but Lightroom hates this and loses track of the file. So a powershell script which sorts the items into year folders was a good idea but I am scared of bricking the db

The nas and the mac are all wired up on 1 gbit and I am sure it should be ok because the big raws are only like 70mb per file

Regards :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Franconian_Nomad@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, tell her to: Purge all doubles and objectively bad pictures (like unintentionally out of focus ones) from her library and also to keep only the best ones from a series. She should get rid of the JPEG’s or at least save them separately. Yes, weeding out that will take a long time with that many photos. I know the struggle.

Also, adobe lightroom is great, but I’m not sure if it’s that good when only used as a library. Maybe look for some alternatives. They might be even more functional with your NAS. There’s an opensource Programm called Darktable for example. Might be worth checking it out.

I’ve heard many professional and semi-professional photographers are afraid of data loss. So many keep the following precautions:

  • Never reuse SD-cards, archive the full ones and buy new ones. Copy them to hard drives and/or external ssd‘s.

  • When the ssd‘s are full, archive them and get new ones.

  • Have a copy of all pictures in the cloud. I believe adobe offers a monthly plan for example.

Sorry, I’m just a hobby photographer myself, so that are just my 2 cents. Hope I could help at least a little bit.

[–] itchick2014@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve done professional photography for a decade and have never seen someone not reuse a SD card…even outside of myself. Most photographers I know use cloud services to back up.

[–] Franconian_Nomad@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, interesting. I think it heard in several podcasts. But I guess those guys were pretty paranoid about losing data.