542
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] theodewere@kbin.social -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

yeah, because guns are stupid and never help anyone with anything, except in making unstable people worse.. only morons cling to guns for safety.. guns are for the weak and fearful..

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Or you can just think they're cool like a car. Saying something is too dangerous to own is fucking stupid, we sell dynamite commercially and anfo by the ton. Bombings just aren't common because they're are reasonable licensing and registration requirements.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

Saying something is too dangerous to own is fucking stupid

they’re are reasonable licensing and registration requirements.

Don't you think the reason there are licensing and registration requirements for dynamite is because it's too dangerous to own?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's clearly not too dangerous to own, it's dangerous enough to license.... That was my point.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

And if you don't have a license, you are not allowed to ___ it?

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

I'm trying to figure out your logic here. You seem to be trying to defend an undefendable position. Cars, afaik, typically require a license to actually own one, yet we don't consider them too dangerous for someone to own. Are they too dangerous for an unlicensed individual to own? Yeah, but most people can get a license for one.

On the other hand, anyone can own a sword or a crossbow, or (afaik) build a maser out of a couple microwaves if they want to (or until recently, build and own a flamethrower), so those must be perfectly safe to own. I can pull the electron guns out of old CRTs and build a device pretty much guaranteed to cause melanoma in anyone I point it at. I'm sure the people who end up with skin cancer would be happy to know that the hacked-together cancer-beam I created is perfectly safe because it doesn't require a license to own.

So I'm trying to figure out what your point is. You seem to be trying to say that if something is restricted, then it is "too dangerous to own" but that's obviously not true. Yet for some reason, you're trying to cling to this argument.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Are they too dangerous for an unlicensed individual to own? Yeah

Congratulations. You figured out my point in your first paragraph.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Purchase or possess, yes.... You're taking a real slow route to a very obvious point.

Register, license and own whatever the fuck you want.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Purchase or possess

So....... own.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Without a license. You're being a dope, I'm for licensing and registration not a total ban. I'm not quite sure why you chose such a sequitous route good such a stupid point.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm having a little fun poking at you because you called another poster fucking stupid while missing their point entirely, and you called me dope while being completely unable to see the contradiction I was laying out in front of you.

I'll stop here, but you'll have better conversations online if you engage with people sincerely rather than jumping straight to insults about others' intelligence.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I didn't call anyone fucking stupid I said saying guns are too dangerous to own is fucking stupid. Someone can hold an ideal that is idiotic without being an idiot, don't be so thin skinned on sometime else's behalf. There is no contradiction dude, you were/are being a dope.

That's great advice, you should take it.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

My dude, chill out. You'll have better conversations!

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[-] theodewere@kbin.social -5 points 2 years ago

guns are for addle-brained fools who can barely string two thoughts together

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes yes, bigoted hyperbole solves everything and isn't at a projection of your insecurities.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago

and unsurprisingly guns are for people who like to defend themselves by projecting

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How am I projecting anything? I've not said an ill word about or to you.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

you hang onto those guns, son, i'm sure they help you

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oo and you assume I'm younger, want to project a bit more?

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
542 points (98.7% liked)

politics

31455 readers
2683 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS