this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
690 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59631 readers
2671 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

My CompE Master's and my previous work in vision-based AI collision detection systems has left me woefully unprepared to have educated and qualified experience for this exact topic.

That's awesome! Would you share more with us about the research you conducted with Tesla's AutoPilot, and specifically what makes it "experimental"?

I never mentioned children

How convenient, you avoided answering the question at all!

Here you go:

As I suspected, nothing points to the notion that this was caused by AutoPilot. It's caused by inattentive drivers.

This is nothing but shit "journalism" playing on whatever is "hot" and trendy.

I'm sure the 17+ dead human lives really appreciate this "protection".

There are no dead human lives. You're just making that up.

dismissing the findings of engineers close to the technology due to your own biases is incredibly ignorant.

I don't have any biases. "Ignorant" is claiming that a driver assistance system is responsible for driver inattentiveness.

Bye bye now.