this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
512 points (87.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43940 readers
483 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Both Mario Odyssey and SMB Wonder are only innovative in a vacuum where Mario is the only platformer franchise. Which for a lot of people I imagine is the extent of their knowledge about platformers.

The things people call "innovative" about Mario Odyssey are just half Kirby and half Banjo-Kazooie. Yeah Odyssey's biggest maps are way bigger than Banjo-Kazooie, but SMO runs on hardware that can emulate the N64, and it still has quite a few maps on the smaller side

SMB Wonder... I don't actually know what people call "innovative" about SMB Wonder, but I've seen people call it "innovative." It's the best 2D Mario made in the 21st century and it has a pretty cool gimmick. What's innovative about this?

[โ€“] tko@tkohhh.social 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Don't you think people just mean that it feels like a Mario game at the same time as feeling fresh? That's certainly how I felt. It's "innovative" in the sense that there are things that you didn't expect, and that's fun and exciting. I could be wrong, but I don't think anybody means "innovative" in that it's ground-breaking in the larger gaming world or even in the platforming genre.

[โ€“] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

You're right. I think this person is just anti-Mario.

[โ€“] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Innovative" isn't the term I'd use to describe that, but it makes enough sense.

[โ€“] tko@tkohhh.social 2 points 11 months ago

Said another way: the game is innovative (for a Mario game), NOT the game is innovative (for a platformer)

[โ€“] sim_@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Does a map have to be large though? Theres value in a map being exactly as large as it needs to be to fulfill its creative vision.

[โ€“] zagaberoo@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

I genuinely think the push for bigger maps has been a significant toxic influence on game design. Just look at Yooka-Laylee or even Banjo Tooie TBH. That's to say nothing of the modern open-world genre.

I feel the same way about photorealism. I want artistic interpretations much more than I want rote simulations.

[โ€“] Wahots@pawb.social 2 points 11 months ago

This was especially evident after the re-release of sunshine and Galaxy. Sunshine had smaller, tighter levels. Galaxy had more ambitious levels that put fun over eye candy. I replayed them both after beating odyssey just to make sure it wasn't rose tinted glasses.