this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
1407 points (96.4% liked)

solarpunk memes

2736 readers
541 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Just the third word actually. Sorry about that. How about now?

google carbon capture

[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Of course, who the hell browser the web without one?

[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That's why the ads didn't show up then.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes that's why I use an adblocker. Otherwise every search will just turn up some sponsored stuff relevant to the search. See:

google dildo

[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Did you somehow forget what the purpose of your research was?

Read the post again.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago

My "research" was to show that no, the first results aren't sponsored stuff for me.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

14th word actually — sponsored

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

When I search, I don't see sponsored results at all though

[–] misophist@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's not a default Google screen. You're missing the point if you're showing screenshots that have been adulterated by third party tools that scrub parts of the page.

OP: "Google is paid by nefarious corporations to appear at the top of their results to change the social narrative."

You: "wrong! It doesn't happen on a completely different site, or if I use third-party tools to remove the links in question!"

Well, no doy.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Google is paid by corporations to sell you stuff based on your search. That's the whole point of keyword based sponsoring. You can be searching for dildos, solar panels or marriage counseling and you'll get sponsored links. It doesn't say anything about the actual thing other than that someone is trying to profit off it. Dildos aren't scam because someone is trying to sell me one when I search for them.

google dildo

OP: "Google is paid by nefarious corporations to appear at the top of their results to change the social narrative."

OP told me I'd get sponsored results as the top of the google search. I didn't. Because I'm not some weirdo who chooses not to use an adblock, that's a caveat OP left out.

If you want to see sponsored results, be my guest, but don't assume everyone is like that.

[–] misophist@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're trying really hard to miss the point. I hope it makes you feel proud, or happy, or good in some way, dude, because it doesn't really contribute to the conversation. You're just derailing and making it about you. Yay, you.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

Great argument.

[–] onkyo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

What are you talking about? The point was that fossil fuel companies are promoting carbon capture. Not that google without adblock is going to show you sponsored content. Everyone knows that.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

The point was that fossil fuel companies are promoting carbon capture.

Shell is one of the sponsored results for me for solar power. A Finnish gas giant was one of the results for recycling. Same for biodegradable products. For wind and hydro, the result was two large coal energy producers.

Does that tell "everything you need to know" about those or is it just a case of companies angling to make money out of something?