373

Newsweek.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Please Donald piss off the wrong people. I double dog dare you.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 16 points 2 years ago

If the Internet goes off, it means most of the US will be pissed off at him. Cellphones would be basically useless.

His followers wouldn't be able to access their favorite propaganda and conspiracy theories, either, so maybe they'd sober up a bit. Either way, it would not be good for him.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I mean, he can't. Even if he claims to have the executive power, even if he found a bunch of lackeys willing to try to do it for him, he can't do it. Whatever he did would be unenforceable. You can't just turn off the Internet. That's literally the reason we invented it in the first place, it's a communication network resilient against nuclear strikes and war and bad-faith governance all at once.

He could probably make it very hard to use, given a lot of time, but he'd be eaten alive by the angry populace long before it ever reached that point.

[-] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

How many internet service providers would have to go along before the internet was effectively off? 3? 4?

[-] MrShankles@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

You wouldn't need an ISP to have servers communicate, if push comes to shove. So maybe "effectively off" as we know it, but damn near impossible to stop communication if people need it

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I mean, off for whom? There's people who think facebook IS the internet and will be forced to go outside if they can't read their racist memes today. For critical comms, you'd have to shut off way more than 3 or 4 big companies to make a dent. For sensitive, high-bandwidth applications that involve a lot of people being online at once, you would need to hit fewer before the damage is noticeable.

[-] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I agree that the internet is far more than facebook. But if you're blocked at the edge of the network by your ISP, there's really not much you can do. You'll have access to nothing, Facebook or otherwise. Not even something low bandwidth.

If At&t, Comcast, Charter, Verizon, and T-Mobile suddenly stopped providing service to all their customers, then essentially no-one would be able to use anything on the internet at all. Even if the backbone itself (which I believe is largely owned by those same companies, but not sure) and some large datacenters that are their own isps were able to keep talking to each other, anything business or user facing would stop.

Some people who run their own mesh networks might be able to stay in contact (and people would try and start some local ones as this disaster unfolds), but that's so few people.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

But we still haven't established why. It makes no sense that companies that only make money providing a service would stop providing the service. I wouldn't even be able to pay my ISP because that happens over the Internet.

[-] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I was assuming this was the government ordering the companies to. They have no incentive to do so on their own. But I believe there was a bill (which thankfully didn't pass) that would have given the president the power to essentially order the internet turned off.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Why would a company agree to stop making money?

[-] docAvid@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

Who are the wrong people? Have people similar to them offered significant resistance to past fascist regimes?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago

Yes.

The first time they lost because liberals actively embargoed them while selling guns and oil under the table to the fascists.

[-] docAvid@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure you're talking about the same thing billwashere was talking about, but I'd like to hear more of your thoughts.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
373 points (90.1% liked)

politics

31423 readers
2675 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS