this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
155 points (94.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
436 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just recently I was in a conversation with a number of UK mainlanders and we had a debate over what "tories" meant, apparently disproportionately ordinarily it refers to a political party and it's not usual to use it as short for "territories" as I've used it (according to how the debate ended, it was half and half between them). And once again I'm reminded of how people feel to look back at their usage of a word/phrase over the years and cringe.

More tragically, me and a friend were embarrassed once upon realizing everyone was confusing "encephalitis" with "hydrocephalus" when talking to someone about their kid with hydrocephalus. Awkward because encephalitis is caused by HIV.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I didn't realize "effect" and "affect" were different words for a long time.

[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

It's freeing to just use whatever one you want with zero effect.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago
[–] CallumWells@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

ÆØÅ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I always used the two as different tenses of the same word except for the fact that "affect" can also be the verb form of "affectionate".

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

“Effect” is a noun, while “affect” is a verb. You can cause effects, by affecting something. “Affecting” is the act of causing effects, while “effects” are the actual causes of an affliction.

As an example, let’s say you get drunk. There are two different ways to phrase the same scenario: you are feeling the effects of the drinking, or you are being affected by the drinks. The end result is the same, but you need separate words for them.

In the former, you are feeling the effects. Feeling is the verb, effects is a noun. The same way you would feel the clothes against your skin, or the ground beneath your feet. But with the latter phrasing, the drink is acting upon you, so you need a verb; You are being affected by it. The same way you would be affected by someone else in the bar pushing you. Falling over is the effect, because you were affected by the push.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Effect and affect are both verbs. They are also both nouns.

effect n. meaning as you described: "The effect of the potion was that I grew three sizes."
affect v. meaning as you described: "The potion affected everyone the same way."
effect v. meaning "to successfully cause": "The potion I'm mixing will effect a revolution among the goblins."
affect n. meaning face or appearance: "Realizing she was about to drink the life-changing potion, the goblin's entire affect shifted to delight."

[–] monotremata@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

You know that the other two words also exist though, right? Like, you can effect change in an organization, and there can be something strange in the affect of a psychopath. So there's a verb "to effect" and a noun "affect" (although here the pronunciation is different--the accent is on the first syllable). It's true that the most common usages follow the rules you're laying out, but it genuinely is an oversimplification.

[–] 8bitguy@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The arrow affected the aardvark.
The movie had great special effects.

Somewhat grim for the poor aardvark, I suppose. It's useful though.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

That's a good way to remember it.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, you can pretty much always use effect unless you're affecting a fancy manner.

I am strongly in favor of depreciating affect.

[–] haydng 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You may find you mean deprecating.

Depreciating is reducing in value due to time, deprecating is disapproving of (or in software, marking as obsolete)

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Sigh, that one I can legitimately blame on autocorrect and adhd.