this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023

716 points (100.0% liked)

196

16368 readers

1899 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone

moss@lemmy.world

queue@beehaw.org

funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone

PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone

threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone

greembow@lemmy.world

remotelove@lemmy.ca

Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de

qaz@lemmy.world

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee

qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world

qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com

qaz@sh.itjust.works

qaz@lemmy.sdf.org

716

Merger Rule (i.imgur.com)

submitted 10 months ago by alexiascylding@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Better to have a million shitty ones with no exclusivity than to have one with everything

[–] Figureinplastic@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm not totally sure I agree with that...

[–] Baguette@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

One monopoly on streaming means they'd probably jack the prices up a lot since they would be the only legal way to watch things (and theyd probably crack down on piracy even more)

Multiple streaming services at least helps keep prices at a reasonable level

Hard agree though that exclusives are the worst thing streaming services adopted

[–] orangeboats@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

One with everything will be far more expensive than millions with one thing, and if you disagree with the service you wouldn't be able to switch to another one.

[–] Yggnar@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If it were enforceable I would, but "no exclusivity" is a pipe dream.