this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
104 points (81.7% liked)

RealTesla

478 readers
1 users here now

  1. Posts must be about Tesla, EV, or AV
  2. Meta Posts must be pre-approved.
  3. Shitposts are limited
  4. No Elon Worship
  5. All Links must include the original title of the Content
  6. Sites behind Paywalls must have text included.
  7. Don't be an asshole
  8. No Image Posts

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dragontamer@lemmy.world
dragontamer@lemmy.ca
104
It Took 36,000 Gallons Of Water To Extinguish A Burning Tesla (jalopnik.com)
submitted 11 months ago by dragontamer@lemmy.world to c/realtesla@lemmy.world
84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A new crash recently in Alabama, but a reminder to something that we all know. Burning Teslas are far more difficult to extinguish than any other car.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’ve personally burned LFP cells in an inert nitrogen pressure vessel and they very much do burn. They’re “better” than more reactive chemistries like NCA and NMC, but they do still burn (see story of burning teslas). That battery compartment likely has very little air in it, due to the large volume of gas vented during thermal runaway.

This was the tidbit relevant to the most discussion down thread. I appreciate your knowledge! Thanks for sharing your experience.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

I should also clarify when I say burn, I mean strap an electrical heater to a battery and observe the response. Heater is meant to represent an internal cell short circuit failure (which is typically cited as leading reason for thermal runaway outside of bad/defective battery design)