this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
862 points (96.9% liked)

Work Reform

9916 readers
662 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall-free link: https://archive.is/eV7A5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bouh@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

No, because then one company would exploit this. And it would still be a big loss for the companies not owning the real estate.

[–] kunsfwra@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 9 months ago

They all collaborated on coordinated layoffs, which was blamed on blind by potential insiders in vanguard pressuring CEOs and I don't think any tech company skipped the order.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago

Some companies continued WFH, some were full remote even before the pandemic. They are shown to be very competitive in their markets. OTOH, many RTO companies have been shown to be hurt b their RTO policies, but leadership didn't care. Insiders usually point to commercial real estate investments as the reason, where the owners decided they themselves will lose less money if their companies tank a bit, but their other investments don't take a dive.

It's not even a conspiracy at this point. Sure, there are weird middle manager types and people who hate being at home and all that, but the main driving force behind institutional change at megacorps is not Joe the team lead with 6 rungs above him and one below on the corporate ladder.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Exploit higher costs and lower productivity paying for office space?