Unless you are a farmer or similar, it is far more sustainable to live in a town. Living in an expansive rural acreage or in a suburb is a luxury that we shouldn't cater to.

What are you even trying to say ?

I'm saying public transportation in rural areas is feasible, and something that is sustained in many parts of the world. There's nothing about your situation that makes it so it wouldn't work for you. You've just been heavily propagandized by capitalists who profit from our current broken system.

[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yes. We do need infrastructure. Not what your comment said though. Unfortunately there no infrastructure to the nearest village so no chance it's coming even further out.

What does being on the same transport change ? What are you getting at ? What's the point in this ?

You don't think "we" should allow people to love rural?

Who is this "we" why are you deciding for the masses where they should live?

Only farmers are allowed to love rural. Are you perchance a child or something.

I've not and I think it is you who is "slightly" out of touch with reality. Maybe check in on that one aye.

More public transportation would benefit all.

Of you actually built proper transportation with hubs that link into more transportation then we could spread out a live more rural.