this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
773 points (100.0% liked)

196

16310 readers
2642 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

There are tree eating fungi but that is not one of them.

Based on what?

According to my quick research, symbiotic fungus doesn't fruit unless the tree is in trouble. That tree seems fine, so then the fungus probably isn't good for the tree

[–] Inconcinnity@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Where on earth are you researching to come to that conclusion? Mushrooms overwhelmingly fruit based on climatic conditions. If the weather is right, they fruit. And it is well established that mycorrhizal fungi are good for the trees and other plants they have symbiotic relationships with, which is why fungal inoculation is becoming increasingly popular. It's also why they are called symbiotic, and not parasitic.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] Swallowtail@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

I think you're right