this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
124 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2095 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Looks like House Republicans are down another vote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 120 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Almost dies in a mass shooting.......opposes ban on assault weapons.

Needs a stem cell transplant.......opposed embryonic stem cell research in 2020.

I'm sorry the guy's sick but damn if he isn't the poster boy for hypocrisy.

[–] bmsok@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I disagree with this guy on everything so it compelled me to read the article.

He's receiving an autologous stem cell transplant. They came from his own body.

It's a bone marrow transplant back from his own healthy cells that they harvested before they got rid of the cancerous cells via chemotherapy.

Still a douche when it comes to embryonic stem cell research, though.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For autologous stem cell research to run embryonic stem cell research had to walk.

Source: am guessing

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 10 months ago

*almost dies in a mass shooting and is saved by a black lesbian

still votes against gun safety and lgbtq rights

[–] teft@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm all for gun control but the guy who shot Scalise did it with an SKS and a handgun. Neither of those are classified as assault weapons.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I don't know the exact details of the weapon he used, but there are aftermarket detachable magazine mods for the SKS that are fairly common (though I've often heard they're pretty unreliable) that would make them qualify as an assault weapon under many assault weapon laws.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

im fine with banning both

[–] Froyn@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I thought the SKS was a knockoff AK-47?

[–] teft@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They fire the same rounds but I wouldn't really consider them a knockoff. SKS was made sort of as an answer to the M1 carbine and other lighter shorter weapons. This was in comparison to the Mosin Nagant which is a big beefy boy and hard to lug around. Also the SKS was designed 4 years before the AK47.

[–] Froyn@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

I was never a big "gun guy", so my limited exposure was during the gun shows of the 90s. They'd always have AKs and SKSs (I believe they were Chinese manufactured) on display/sale. Extended family members bought a few just before Michigan's (now expired) ban went into effect. As a kid, they all looked about the same to me (fired the same ammo, interchangeable clips, etc).

So I learned something new today and I appreciate your response.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

You're likely thinking of the Galil

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I know it's kind of ironic, but in this case it's more specifically an autologous stem cell transplant. That's where they take progenitor cells that become blood cells from your bloodstream, then give powerful chemotherapy that destroy any blood progenitor cells remaining in your body (to also kill the blood cancer cells). Then they repopulate you with your own stem cells they originally harvested (so you can, you know, make more blood again). So no fetal stem cells involved in this treatment. It's a pretty intense treatment though with a mortality risk. Most commonly people are in the hospital for quite a while for this.

I'm sure many opponents of embryonic stem cell research have benefited from results of that research even if they don't realize though.