this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
355 points (99.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43952 readers
860 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren't worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Digital cables, like HDMI and USB. If they meet the spec, they should operate identically.

ETA: It's a digital signal: either it works or it doesn't. There's no "higher quality" version of the same image. Sure, if you have a 4K 120hz HDR signal you might need an HDMI 2.1 spec cable, but as long as it meets that spec, it'll either work or need to be returned. The signal won't be washed out, or crackly, or static-y (all the concerns we had with analog video cables back in the day); the signal might not work, or it might drop out from time to time, which means it doesn't meet spec.

Same with USB-C. If it doesn't charge your phone correctly, or have the transfer speeds you want, because you bought it at a Dollar Store and it isn't in spec, the problem isn't USB-C, it's the fact that the manufacturer sold you an out-of-spec cable.

[โ€“] skulblaka@startrek.website 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Getting good quality cables can make a difference.

Getting gold-plated cables will not ever. I fucking see you Monster. For $40 a cable that thing better also come with a free handy and an ice cream.

[โ€“] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Quality" just means "in spec." It's a digital signal; it can't be of a higher or lower quality, it just either works or it doesn't.

[โ€“] skulblaka@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Build quality does matter though. Especially for a cable that will be plugged in and out frequently.

That was kind of my point with the gold plated cables though; the ads for them will act like they're better in some way and that you'll get ultra high speed super definition picture or whatever. But it's the same damn spec as the Amazon Basics cable.

[โ€“] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The specification includes the cable's capabilities, though. And sure, build quality can affect longevity, but if it doesn't meet the minimum capability at time of manufacture, it's not in spec.

But yeah, especially back in the early 2000s/2010s when we were making the jump from analog to digital cables, a lot of companies were trying to convince consumers that digital cables had to be made of premium materials like analog cables did, despite the fact that part of the point of digital cables is that the signal is binary both in composition and in nature: it's made of 1s and 0s, but it also either works or it doesn't.

[โ€“] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

When I saw someone mentioned HDMI cables I knew I would find Monster reference somewhere, and I was pleasantly surprised it was so high up the chain of replies.

[โ€“] TheKracken@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

USB -C would like to talk to you. So many bad terrible cables.

[โ€“] Bob_Robertson_IX@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"If they meet specs" is the important thing, and unfortunately that's hard to know, though that $0.99 cable at the gas station isn't going to cut it.

[โ€“] voracitude@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

that's hard to know

Hit the nail on the head there. I still need to find a decent retailer for cables I don't need a tester to confirm are in spec.

[โ€“] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Those bad terrible cables don't meet spec, I guarantee it.

[โ€“] sxan@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

HDMI, yes. Not so much for USB cables.

USB cables are (commonly) subject to more stress; they're often moved, plugged, unplugged, and can often have lifespans far longer than the devices they're using to connect. There are other, non-spec-related factors that impact durability, such as nylon wrapping, more robust connectors, and so on. Durability isn't as much a factor for HDMI, ethernet, or optical cables, but for USB, sometimes durability is worth extra money, if only to reduce e-waste.

[โ€“] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That isn't as true with HDMI as it used to be. Now that we are pushing 4k120hz across the cables, the signal integrity matters more than it did when HDMI was commonly used for 1080p60.

This is even moreso the case if you have longer HDMI runs.

[โ€“] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But you're still not going to get appreciably different performance or longevity from a $50 USB-C cable than from a $10 USB-C cable.

And I recognize that it's not exactly the same thing, but as a decent rule of thumb, if the company is willing to actually build the thing in spec, they're probably doing a good enough job that it's going to last a reasonable amount of time, so the spec is still useful for that purpose. To wit: I've never had an in-spec USB-C cable or connector fail.

[โ€“] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago

I have, but your probably right in the general.

Most recently, I had a plug housing (aluminium) seperate from the guts when I tugged on it. It's not like it happens frequently; Apple lightning cables are far more fragile, but that's probably by design.

[โ€“] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not unless you're on the bleeding edge of tech. You need a specific cable to get the full bandwidth of 4K 144Hz in HDR via HDMI, and the ultra cheap ones just won't cut it, even if they claim to meet spec. You still don't have to spend more than ~$15, though.

[โ€“] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, you're basically saying the same thing. For that purpose, you need something that meets the HDMI 2.1 spec. It's not a specific cable, you just need the one that meets spec, and they cost about $15.

[โ€“] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

In 99% of cases you'd be correct. There are other considerations you might want to consider when buying a cable other than just meeting spec. For example, if you have a pet, getting a cable with a durable nylon sleeve might be a good idea.

Another thing that might be worth in some unique situations would be getting a more flexible cable so it could squeeze in a tight space, or a 45โฐ/90โฐ connector...

Note that it doesn't always means that it will be expensive to get, and I do agree with you that the important thing is to stay away from the snake oil cables who promise better image/sound quality or whatever.

[โ€“] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

In theory, but sadly the market is flooded with crappy usb C cables.