Asklemmy

43939 readers

403 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Do you think the fediverse has become a save space for radicals? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 years ago by vis4valentine@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The alt social media are a good place to run away from algorithms and explicit mass manipulation from other big tech, be more free, independent, and spread ideas, but I also think that the fediverse is being filling with people with radical political ideologies, some kicked out of traditional social platforms for this same reason. I'm not saying that we can't have discussions, but I think that many people are making their own echo Chambers in the fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Brattea@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

A toe jam eating pedo, yes. A nazi I dont think so.

[+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] Brattea@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Okay I know people think it's below the belt very frequently, and I understand the desire to give people reasonable doubt. No one wants these allegations levied on them. So we expect a lot of evidence before such an accusation. I have listened to recordings of Richard talking about pedophilia I will not be able to produce for you here. However if you go to stallman.org go to the search bar and type in pedophilia go and read his writings. Go and read the redacted reports from the MIT public mailing list.

Mind you I'm not saying he abused children but he certainly has tried in the past to normalize sexual advances to minors.

This was a bit out of pocket though I was trying to be edgy. Another thing I would like to say is that pedophiles are not morally bankrupt by virtue of being pedophiles. They are morally at fault when they normalize touching children, they are morally at fault when they assault children.

Sorry this got a lot darker than it had to.