this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
638 points (88.5% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
3356 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
638
Elon Musk's X claims it's now a 'video-first platform' as it tries to reverse an advertiser exodus that has cost it billions in value (fortune.com)
submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
288 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The claim is a major departure for the service, which has long been known as a destination for posting short snippets of text.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I know, I said sarcasm is hard, didn't I?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That also doesn't make much sense as a reply.

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Man, get those neurons checked. If you think the initial comment wasn't sarcasm, you need. to go and read the definition.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It absolutely wasn't "sarcasm".

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

OK, maybe it wasn't sarcasm in the traditional sense, but it was clearly not something pro-Musk, which is why most dumbasses are downvoting.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, it wasn't sarcasm in any sense.

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to.

But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more.

I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless.

[–] decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

You mean it is hard for you to execute it?