this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
566 points (95.8% liked)

Political Memes

5341 readers
3094 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WR5@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I know this is all fun and games and to be taken in jest, so I understand the stick in the mud reply. However, I think people deserve to live. Choosing to save objects over people shows we (the collective we, not specifically the ones replying) are no better than conservatives who prioritize objects and money over lives. I'd like to think I'd help whomever is nearest/most injured/in most need of help etc. in the situation, just like if it was any other arbitrary group of people. My standards shouldn't change just because they wouldn't do the same for me, my conscience would still feel guilty even if theirs wouldn't.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What if choosing those objects meant saving a lot more lives though

[–] WR5@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

For sure a point, but I still don't think I could.

[–] Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well none of them chose anyone over themselves, so they reap what they sew. Gimme pizza and tacos.

[–] WR5@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah I understand the sentiment.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's the "golden rule". Do onto others as you would have them do to you. You're arguing against the bronze rule which is an eye for an eye, which is an excellent point.

Mathematical modeling has shown that the most just societies operate on the gold plated bronze rule. The idea here is that you initially treat people according to the golden rule, however after repeated abuse wears out the plating you transition to the bronze rule. This ensures human decency while protecting against agents acting in bad faith trying to profit by destroying society and repeatedly abusing the golden rule.

In this case you leave them in the fire, not because they would do it to you, but because they have burned and continue to burn so many people that every second they're alive they cause a tremendous damage to society.

[–] WR5@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

That makes sense. Keeping them alive would do more net damage than saving them, in terms of human lives.