this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
151 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

12 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0xtero@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's more or less the same problem as XMPP (end-to-end encrypted, federated chat protocol) had with Google Talk.

All users went to Google and then Google broke interoperability with federated servers, leaving them dead/unable to communicate with the majority of users.

Later Google killed the project as they always do. XMPP is still around, but the userbase is very small.

Here's a post worth reading:
https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

The "fediverse" has been gaining traction recently, the fear is that Meta comes in with 1.2bn users, gets everyone on their service and the breaks federation, leaving the rest of the fediverse a drying carcass as they "move on".

Personally, I don't really care about the "popularity contest" - I'm not here because the community is large, I'm here because it isn't. Signal > Noise. So I'm all for defederation.

Meta has zero trust after all they've done.