AI

4151 readers

1 users here now

Artificial intelligence (AI) is intelligence demonstrated by machines, unlike the natural intelligence displayed by humans and animals, which involves consciousness and emotionality. The distinction between the former and the latter categories is often revealed by the acronym chosen.

founded 3 years ago

Congress told AI firms should pay for copyrighted content (www.theregister.com)

submitted 10 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/artificial_intel@lemmy.ml

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I agree. It's basically just stealing work from others and not paying them or agreeing to licensing. Long term, it's not a good thing

For software development, AI is a useful tool, but it's likely also stealing licensed code and adding it to other people's code in some circumstances

If AI companies want to use training data, that's ok, but they should pay all of the creators it's trained from

[–] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Respect your opinion and where you're coming from, but disagree simply for the fact that this will create a silo of corporatized AI because they will be the only ones who will have the ability to pay for the IP at the necessary scale (that's not to say that this is not already happening to an extent with the existing model). I do think the conversation is worth having though about the public value of data that's readily available on the internet and how it squares with our (imo) outdated IP laws. How do we ensure that individual creators retain full control and benefit of their art/content/knowledge, while not stifling or unduly hampering AI research? How much protection do we afford data that users willingly put on the internet that's publicly available? And who pays for the data in the chain?

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All of those questions are already asked and answered for regular copyright. Sorted out for music, movies, books, etc.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

And what a wonderful system we have as a result.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Should human programmers have to pay creators every time they look at code while they're learning? I (and most people) have literally copy/pasted code from various websites into my own programs without any sort of payment or notice.

[–] Maestro@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you copy/pasted without any licensed then you've broken copyright yourself. It's a good way to get into trouble in a professional setting.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's not what AI does, though.

[–] Maestro@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's what BlameThePeacock admitted to doing.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Sure, but it has nothing to do with what AI does.