this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
1002 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59731 readers
3171 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

A couple of five second ads doesn't bother me at all.

I'm from a generation that had no pause or fast forward on the TV before the internet. Every fifteen minutes or so you'd have near enough five minutes of ads. YouTube ads are nothing by comparison.

$10 a month isn't a huge amount, but it's $120 saved by the end of the year that I'd rather spend on something else.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I’m from a generation that had state television where there were no ads at all. I liked it that way.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Starting from the premise that these services deserve the revenue from ads is completely wrong. As advertising has grown, so has corporate greed in extracting more value from users while providing a worse service.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Starting from the premise that we owe corporations the opportunity to subject us to mental abuse for any reason is the problem. Let's not forget what ads are and how they work.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you for the most part, but at the same time people need a way to find the things they want. There are lots of products and services that genuinely make life better, but without advertising you may never even know what you're missing.

That position is completely in the distance behind where we are now, with the pure exploitation and manipulative marketing, but it's still a valid point.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you.

My rule of thumb has always been, since I was a child: if it's advertised on TV, it probably isn't that good.

TV advertising is expensive. The business needs to pay for that advertising, and they also expect to profit from it. Thus, the customers have to pay for the advertising, the profits to the business for the advertising, as well as the product, and the profits to the business for the product. So, in general, if it's advertised on TV it's probably not worth what they want you to pay.

Recently there's been an online therapy service that has grown massively called Better Health. It sounds really good, and content producers I like have apparently thought the same and started advertising it themselves - Behind the Bastards host Robert Evans actually voices an ad for them on his own podcast. However, I've also recently seen advertisements for their service on TV. Now, I'm wary, and I'm just waiting for what I think will be the inevitable controversy over their service.

So yeah, advertising has some valid purpose, but it's also basically complete and totally open warfare. Marketing executives are probably worse than estate agents at this point. At the same time, a person just promoting their idea might not be so villainous - at least right now, who knows what they'll do later?

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

In the UK you have to pay the TV licence for state television, so it's swings and roundabouts.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm from that generation too and as soon as I moved out of my folks' house I never subscribed to cable or watched broadcast TV because that constant onslaught of advertising was offensive and I didn't want it in my home.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m from a generation that had no pause or fast forward on the TV before the internet.

Me too, but using ublock for a while it's easy and quick to become intolerant of ads.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I do understand the appeal but I also quite like a lot of the smaller content creators and I think they deserve to get paid.

Pirating from a corporation that makes several millions in profits is one thing, I'm not going to pick the pockets of my fellow man.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ethically it is not so easy, you are also giving money to the evil google. The ideal is to donate directly, so they are not subject to youtube's stingy payments or demonetizations.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I agree. But I'd rather pay my fellow man even if it means corporate fat cats are also getting a slice.

I did receive a Project Farm t-shirt as a gift which was nice, but I unfortunately don't have the resources to subscribe to each and every patreon so I'll watch the ads in lieu.

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

I mean I had that too, but fuck ads. All my homies hate ads.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm from a country where we barely had ads on TV back in the day, and even now it's nowhere near as bad as on American TV. I've tried watching US channels online and it's feels like nothing but an insult. YouTube is bad enough for me.