this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
160 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

34994 readers
233 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Update 1/16 - Adblock has informed BleepingComputer that its engineers fixed the problem and released ABP 3.22.1 and AB 5.17.1 on the Opera and Edge extension stores. The same versions are currently in review on the Mozilla and Chrome add-on stores, and should be made available soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

YouTube trying to prevent ad blockers is like Nintendo trying to prevent homebrew on the 3ds.

It's not gonna happen.

[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's a bold statement since they own the stream we're watching from

If they embed the ads, and block things like sponsoblock from working, it'll get pretty hard to filter them.

I pay for premium, but I watch a LOT of YT and listen to a lot YT music so I don't mind paying ATM.

[–] alphafalcon@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Embedding ads into the stream would be hard to counter, but it's far away. That would invalidate caches along the way and need extra performance to reencode the stream with the ads inserted.

That's extra costs that are hopefully orders of magnitude above the lost ad revenue from ad blockers

[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ya, but it's hard to use logic for a company that realistically has too much money and power if they decide they want to 'win' against ad-blockers.

That said, I do use adblock(Ublock Origin), Sponsorblock, and I even have / use pihole in the house, and I guess being a 'premium' subscriber overrides their messing with ad blockers. With my TV(nvidia shield) or Browser (Firefox) I do not get any delays / problems. So at least that's good for now.

[–] alphafalcon@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

To a certain degree, yes. If someone at Google decides to wage all-out war against ad blockers they have a good chance. But if that costs more money than it generates, odds are that someone will stop it. Google / Alphabet is publicly traded after all and that means profit above all else.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That would encourage competition. Completely disabling Adblock will be the first step in YouTube 2.0

[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago

I mean, perhaps, but it the infrastructure, creators and user base are pretty big hurdles to overcome. I keep my head up watching Odyssey, peertube etc... but they seem mostly fringe creators so far.

Competition is good no doubt