this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
859 points (100.0% liked)

196

16591 readers
2352 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] capital@lemmy.world 93 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s a bit like saying “you think individuals consume a lot of food? Look at restaurants!”

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yeah it's a shitty parsing of it, because my mind went there too.

But if the restaurant was using 1 entire cow to make 1 single 1/2lb burger, that's on the restaurant to do better.

There's a lot of that happening that corporations need to focus on.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 22 points 10 months ago

The emissions attributed to Shell are the emissions of their customers. People love to play dumb to make a point.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

True. Plus the whole backstory of car companies buying and destroying what little public transit there was in this country to force us into cars.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

destroying what little public transit there was

Hey now, let's not stray into historical revisionism. Make no mistake: there was a lot of public transit back in the early 20th century. For example, here's Atlanta's streetcar map from exactly 100 years ago:

That's not just a fuck-ton more streetcar (or subway/other rail) routes than Atlanta has now; that was legitimately good coverage of most of the city!


Edit: Oh yeah, and that applies to intercity rail too, by the way:

Never forget the full breadth and scope of what was stolen from us.

[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but perhaps people could stop eating at that restaurant?

Because how some people currently are acting is that they continue to support these corporations, unwilling to switch to alternatives.

[–] toxic_cloud@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You need a car to get to work. How are you supposed to not buy oil? The point is the fossil fuel industry gave us no real alternative, you don't have to eat at a restaurant to survive but you need a job to.

[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No I don't. I don't even have a driving license.

It's also not just about cars. Oil is in other products people can try to avoid. Everyone can do something. Everything between voting for the right direction to changing your whole life around it. It doesn't matter where, as an individual, you can exist on that spectrum. As long as people don't just throw their hands to the air and deny all responsibility.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Yea, bc you're German. Americans aren't so lucky, and nothing constructive comes from acting like that makes you superior to Americans, who for the most part are literally forced to drive places

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If the restaurant is the only source of food around, what do you do then? Not eat?

It transpose into the fact that North American societies made car centric cities with poor public transit where many place that aren't a city, you need a car to literally do everything.

And even cities cut budgets for public transit.

A simple example from a friend of mine. He makes an effort to go to work by public transit instead of taking his car.

If he takes his car, it's a 10 minutes ride. If he takes public transit, it takes him an hour to get to work. I wouldn't blame him for taking his car to get to work.

[–] alci@jlai.lu 1 points 10 months ago

Well, ten minutes by car probably means he could gobwith a bicycle !