this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
140 points (98.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
376 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I assume there must be a reason why sign language is superior but I genuinely don't know why.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

ASL (or whichever sign language) is NOT a direct visual translation of English or French or Mandarin or whatever. It's a totally different language and the written language is a second language. People might be highly proficient at reading and writing English in an English speaking country but it's a different language.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And incredibly regional as well.

Any isolated language with a small local population is going to differentiate quickly, and while the Internet is bringing everyone together and making written language more consistent, it's not like deaf people send each other videos online, they just use written English because it's insanely easier and faster for everyone.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I knew a 3/4 deaf girl who had learned ASL, who had a bf who was fully deaf from birth… he did send her videos of himself signing.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sure, lots of couples send videos to each other.

But I doubt that was their sole method of conversation

I meant more of general conversation, like instead of scrolling comments on here, we had to watch a video of what everyone say without knowing where it was going.

Completely impractical

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 1 points 10 months ago

Well, it's not like being handicaped is practical.
People with disability have to deal with impractical situation all the time bc what is practical for able people is just not faisable or extremely unpractical for them, and society is far from being inclusive.

[–] Devi@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

A decent amount of deaf people don’t speak English so wouldn’t be using written English. Schools that teach both are actually called dual language schools

[–] DeadPand@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Deaf people that can’t hear at all, still read and write, please stop speaking for a lifestyle you don’t know anything about.

[–] Devi@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

😂 I’m deaf you numpty. There’s entire deaf communities that don’t read or write english. It’s actually a hotly debated topic as some think kids shouldn’t be forced to learn both.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Only in 'murica (and the anglosphere) could people think that learning more languages could possibly be a bad thing...

[–] Devi@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m not American but it’s suggested that learning a sign language and a ‘spoken’ language at the same time can slow the acquisition of both.

We see it in kids with two ‘spoken’ languages too but I believe to a lesser extent.

If I had a deaf kid I would teach them both but I understand the choices of parents that don’t do that.

[–] DeadPand@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What in the world? It’s commonly understood that children learn the fastest and if you want to learn multiple languages, it’s best learned early..

[–] Devi@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

You've got mixed up there. If you plan to learn multiple languages then it is beneficial to learn as a child but even similar languages, like English and French, can cause issues communicating when young. When learning vastly different languages especially when one is written and one signed it causes a lot of issues. This can leave a deaf child struggling to communicate for a time.

Often deaf parents will choose to stick to sign first.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And they'd have no idea what ASL was....

So what's your point?

Not even every English speaking country uses ASL, and it's different in different regions even in America.

[–] Devi@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You’ve got confused. A lot of deaf people speak ASL, BSL, AUSLAN etc exclusively. They don’t speak English. Speaking both is bilingual.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who's talking about speaking?

We're talking about reading/writing/typing...

I would be insanely surprised if someone used American/British/Australian sign language yet didn't know a single written language. Especially not the one used in their geographical location

[–] Devi@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That blog is an argument for helping them with literacy when in school...

Not giving up on literacy as an adult.

If a deadlf adult has difficulty reading, it's not because they're deaf or it's "not their first language" it's probably because they were left behind in school because really old stereotypes were still around when they were in school

You seem to be arguing that those harmful stereotypes are true, and deaf people are innately bad at written language. Which frankly is offensive enough I'm done here.

Lots of different groups get left behind in schools, it doesn't mean they're stupid, it means they didn't get the education they need.

[–] Devi@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Absolute bollocks. How many languages do you speak? It is difficult to learn a second language, some don’t and there’s an argument that kids shouldn’t be forced to as learning two languages at once can delay their primary language.

Nobody is saying that people who can’t speak two languages are ‘stupid’ except you.

Maybe read a little and you might learn something?

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How many languages do you speak?

I speak 3 confidently, on the path to 5. If the intent is to simply glean information from a native speaker, I'm currently at 7.

It is difficult to learn a second language

It isn't. Americans and some anglophones think that's the case because they're lazy and look for excuses.

some don’t and there’s an argument that kids shouldn’t be forced to as learning two languages at once can delay their primary language.

That's complete bullshit. You do know that kids in most of the world grow up learning between 2 and 3 languages in school and that doesn't impair their native language at all, right?

[–] Devi@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

I’ve replied to your other message with the info that you’re looking for.

Many people speak multiple languages but it’s a choice that parents make for their offspring and some make a different choice.

Some also see other languages as more important and I know in America it’s not uncommon for deaf people to speak ASL and LSM if they come from a Hispanic community.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Who's talking about speaking?

We're talking about reading/writing/typing...

I would be insanely surprised if someone used American/British/Australian sign language yet didn't know a single written language