You're twisting words and replying emotionally. I said it's objectively false/hyperbolic that "any" person can't avoid shell, which I did not contradict.

Read and think before you reply, also resulting to insults is childsplay, nice one

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

"You know shell along with a handful of other companies actively block any other option for us, and hold us captive to their exploitation, right? 🙄" this is an objectively true statement, even after you shift the goalposts. Just because you avoid shell specifically doesn't mean the other oil companies you support are any better. And yes, you support the fuck out of them no matter what because it's current year and everything is made of plastic.

What the fuck even is your point if you're not shitting on poor people like you say? What the fuck was the point of "debunking" the "claim" that oil companies run everything and work to block more sustainable options? What fucking side are you on???? You're like those fuckers who claim to hate netanyahu and likud but only ever mention hamas' crimes, so clearly trying to look like an ascended centrist while supporting mass murder