this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
39 points (65.6% liked)

Space

8781 readers
69 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] captainjaneway@lemmy.world 86 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I wish they would have said "corkscrew pattern of galaxies" instead of "large structure". The galaxies are arranged in a roughly corkscrew pattern that - from Earth - looks like a ring (ie. imagine flipping a spring so you're looking down the hole in the middle).

It's interesting, but the article sure takes its time getting to that basic description. Seems like click bait > quality.

[โ€“] jordanlund@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] finthechat@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's from when George Santos flew outside of the known universe on a rocket and took that pic with his phone

[โ€“] elbarto777@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

That was funny, but I come to this community to escape from U.S. politics.

[โ€“] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's important that they say structure because the scientific discovery is about how these galaxies are gravitationally bound in a cluster. That means that despite the expansion of space, these galaxies will never separate from one another, hence they are a single structure. It's a breakthrough discovery because every model of the universe we currently use says a structure this large is impossible.

[โ€“] captainjaneway@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Fair enough. Maybe the audience just isn't for lay people like me.

[โ€“] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I thought everything was expanding and constantly moving apart? And wont the suns in those galaxies eventually burn out and collapse, turning into blackholes that will eventually fizzle out?

[โ€“] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's true of any galaxies which aren't gravitationally bound. At closer distances (tens/hundreds of millions of light years) gravity wins out over the expansion of space and keeps things together. At larger distances, the expansion of space wins out and clusters of galaxies will drift apart faster and faster until the combined speed of them moving away and us moving away from them will exceed the speed of light and we'll never see those galaxies again.

Our neck of the woods is called the Local Group because scientists are bad at naming things and includes the Milky Way galaxy, and the Andromeda galaxy, as well as between 50 to 80 more galaxies.

As for the black holes, yes, eventually all that will be left are black holes for trillions of years until even those evaporate which is often called the "Heat Death" of the universe. That is just a theory, but if it's true, it won't happen for 1.07x10^106 years. Considering the universe is only 13.8 billion years old right now, that's a very, very, very long time.

[โ€“] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Whaaat? Where can I read more of this expansion vs gravity struggle topic?