SNOOcalypse - document, discuss, and promote the downfall of Reddit.

4678 readers

1 users here now

SNOOcalypse is closing down. If you wish to talk about Reddit, check out !reddit@lemm.ee, !reddit@lemmy.world and !RedditMigration@kbin.social.

This community welcomes anyone who wants to see Reddit gone. Nuke the Snoo!

When sharing links, please also share an archived version of the target of your link.

Rules:

Follow lemmy.ml's global rules and code of conduct.
Keep it on-topic.
Don't promote illegal stuff here.
Don't be stupid, noisy, obnoxious or obtuse (S.N.O.O.)
Have fun, and enjoy the popcorn! 🍿

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lvxferre@lemmy.ml

API protest: r/pics is now NSFW (mashable.com)

submitted 1 year ago by lvxferre@lemmy.ml to c/snoocalypse@lemmy.ml

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive link for the mod statement. From the statement itself:

Anyway, here are some things to keep in mind:

Gore and pornography are still not allowed in /r/PICS.

Remain civil toward one another.

Do not violate the site-wide rules.

This link directs back to this comment.

It is normal to experience special feelings while looking at John Oliver.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SighBapanada@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice, don't give in mods

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's some chance that Reddit Inc. replaces r/pics mods with someone else, due to NSFW'ing the community, so they might need to give in.

Even then the move should show how fucking huge of a difference there is between the global rules being enforced vs. what they want you to believe on. i.e. that the mod code of conduct is toilet paper.

[–] Bozicus@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be (un)fair, the ToS is toilet paper on most for-profit websites.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well... yes. Still - the mod code of conduct is a really strong example of that, as Reddit did nothing whatsoever to pretend that it had any validity. And for a long time it was even hidden as "guidelines", or "look, those aren't actual rules, we're just guiding you okay?"

I wonder if this shouldn't be legislated against - as it's basically deceiving users.

[–] Bozicus@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Fair point. To the extent that a ToS is legally binding, then yeah, it should be illegal to make it deceptive. But my understanding is that a lot of what's in a ToS policy has no legal force, and taking steps to regulate certain aspects of a ToS might have the unwanted effect of giving a ToS more legal recognition overall. It is possible to sign over certain rights to a company, but that doesn't mean the company can sue a customer for breaking the ToS when the customer isn't breaking any laws. So, Reddit can write all the menacing emails they like, but if someone feels like posting a bunch of softcore porn in a large subreddit, all Reddit can actually do is ban them, and if they go too hard on the threatening emails, they could get sued for harassment.