this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
90 points (88.1% liked)

Linux

48356 readers
370 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Looking for a normie KDE distro that works out of the box and is stable without issues.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReCursing@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I chose it because, as I said, Manjaro and SuSE Tumbleweed were the two KDE-focused rolling release distros of which I was aware (not KDE as an afterthought like Fedora or Kubuntu) , and SuSE didn't want to install that day. I'm honestly not sure why we're even still having this argument!

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

So then by now you should have a better understanding of why Manjaro has a bad reputation, and why EndeavourOS is a better recommendation.

Which was the point of this "argument" in the first place.

[–] ReCursing@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not really, no. You've told me why you think Manjaro is bad, but all you've told me about Endeavour is that it's a) better than Manajro for unspecified reasons, and b) it;s Arch with a nicer installer yet somehow doesn't have any of the problems you accuse Manjaro of, despite you claiming (for again unspecified reasons) that is the prime reason for choosing Manjaro as well

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I actually have mentioned all that, but let me summarize it for you:

Both are Arch-based, but have an easy to use graphical installer.

Manjaro holds back packages for 2 weeks from the Arch repos. That causes stability and security issues. The maintainers have also demonstrated a clear pattern of negligence that impacts the whole Arch ecosystem.

EndeavourOS does not hold back packages. They also haven't broken the AUR twice.

That's it. Should be pretty clear why EndeavourOS is the better recommendation.

[–] ReCursing@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Again you seem to think the only point of Manajro or Endeavour are to make it easier to install Arch. Plus you have offered no reason to use Endeavour over Arch

Please note I have not noticed stability or security issues to a greater degree than I have on any other distro that isn't ultra-stable (e.g. Debian Stable)

[–] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Again you seem to think the only point of Manajro or Endeavour are to make it easier to install Arch.

It is.

Plus you have offered no reason to use Endeavour over Arch

Yes I did -- it has a GUI installer. That's the only reason.

Please note I have not noticed stability or security issues to a greater degree than I have on any other distro that isn't ultra-stable (e.g. Debian Stable)

Good for you?

[–] ReCursing@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Again you seem to think the only point of Manajro or Endeavour are to make it easier to install Arch.

It is.

Right, I'm done. I can't be bothered to argue with this level of absolute mind-numbing stupidity any more. Please never say anything to anyone ever again.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Bahahaha.

Manjaro fanboys really are something else.

What else would they possibly be for if not installing Arch with a GUI?