Not The Onion

12368 readers

273 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

444

Oklahoma proposal would make watching porn a felony, ban sexting outside marriage (nypost.com)

submitted 10 months ago by roastedDeflator@kbin.social to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A bill set to be introduced next month would ban consuming or producing sexual content and punish offenders with prison sentences of up to 20 years and $25,000 fines.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Did you read the article with quotes from the guy pushing the bill? They might have thrown CSAM ( CP is inappropriate verbiage) in there as a dog whistle because they want people to believe the "perverts" are coming for their kids. Or it is an attempt to make the bill seem more legitimate. They literally want to cut OK off from social media if it isn't heavily censored. They want to take your freedom of speech away under the guise of stopping "sexual perversion" they they are certainly guilty of themselves.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I did read it and I saw those cherry picked words in the bill, but when reading the full context it prefaces them with “child pornagraphy” in front of it. I don’t doubt the hidden meaning in this bill, I’m trying to help find exact sentences where it separates CSAM from the rest being mentioned.

[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So you're looking for the "how can we make this look good" explanation. You aren't going to find that nonsense here.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I’m looking for the separation of what is related to CSAM and what is related to everyone so I can hit them over the head with it and prove it’s not just a “think of the children” thing. The bill is (probably purposely) ambiguous and I’m having trouble extracting what it being said in the article.

[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There probably is no separation because to them someone who is willing to be so perverted as to watch porn is also willing to prey on the children. The two are one and the same in their heads.