this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
1834 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59607 readers
3435 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 332@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree with you.

Instances can defederate from meta at any point they choose, should it become necessary in the future. Until then, it is a huge boon to the more decentralized parts of the fediverse to get content from where all the "normies" are, as well as giving more visibility to non-meta instances and giving said normies a road to the less data-hungry parts of the network.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

honestly, i think only half-accepting them would be beneficial. it gives meta users a taste of the fediverse but locks them out of a whole bunch of cool stuff that they could have, if they just make an account on one of the instances that they already know because it's in the half that does federate. we just need to ensure we never repeat xmpp's mistake: meta users should never be a majority.

i'll have to discuss this with our admin team, but my initial plan is to defederate meta if usage by them hits 25%. if a critical mass of the fediverse does that, in the worst case we'll split off from them before taking damage, and in the best case we'll actively siphon away their user base. (and if any other tech giant enters the fray, we'll just have to include them in the 25% quota as well.)

update: we discussed the topic and went for an immediate defederation

[–] dismalnow@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

it is a huge boon to the more decentralized parts of the fediverse to get content from where all the “normies” are

This is something I can't understand. There's obviously no profit motive to push fediverse to everyone, and most content is dogshit.

Can you explain why you find either to be preferable?

[–] Thassar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Plus, the more entwined threads is with the rest of the fediverse, the harder it'll be for them to break off. Users will be following Mastodon accounts and posting in Lemmy communities and if Meta does something to break that, they're the ones that'll get the backlash, not the fediverse. We'll just continue along as normal.

[–] Cras@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago