this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
707 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59696 readers
2365 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/6302705

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 191 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Even if the creators weren’t pissed, the entire selling point of streaming was on demand, ad free, and a large library to choose from. Every single streaming service that subdivided Netflix and Hulu’s content shares have reneged on that entire concept by creating smaller libraries, making them unaffordable, and now they’re shoehorning in ads if we won’t cough up more money.

It’s almost like a moral imperative to pirate from these fuckers.

[–] Wojwo@lemmy.ml 70 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The entire selling point of cable was no signal loss and ad free... Then the point of satellite was more options and ad free. Those sneaky ads keep finding their way in.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ads is basically free money for broadcasters. And since greed is the main motivation - the dissension seems to be rather easy for them.

[–] Wojwo@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But it's not greed! It's increasing share holder value! /s

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Damn right! It's somebody else's greed! Totally different.

[–] porksoda@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Don't forget that on-demand is being reduced as well now that many platforms are trickling out episodes for their marquee shows at a weekly rate. Looking at you Apple.

[–] MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

I much prefer the trickle of releases to a lump season dump.

It allows time to digest, discuss and catch up throughout the release schedule if you're invested in the story. You can convince your friends to watch a few episodes to catch up and then watch the end of the season together. You can read fan theories online, formulate your own, and overall each weekly episode can result in a lot of engaging fun interactions.

With a series dump you have to binge it and wait for others to do the same in order to talk about it. The whole time you're actively avoiding spoilers from friends/coworkers and avoiding reading about it online. The end result is you disengage from the fandoms/communities while you are getting through the show, which to me takes a lot of the fun out of a big show.

I compare the difference between Stranger Things and GoT. To me these are probably two of the most significant pop-culture releases in the last decade or so.

Game of Thrones resulted in hundreds of thousands of theories every week online and in public. T-Shirts were made based on popular online theories that never panned out in season. You would rag on friends who guessed the plot twist wrong and deify those who got their predictions spot on. Especially in my demographic the two months GoT was on was all about GoT.

Stranger Things on the other hand, while still wildly popular hits differently. It's much more of a build up to release, a week or two of "man that was awesome" followed by "I hope they make the next season soon." Retroactive discussions happen for a while, but the discussions and the hype fizzles much more quickly.

If I want to watch a trickle release show in one dump, I still can, I just wait until the whole season out, reactivate the subscription. Then I binge it.

For me it's much more fun to have an episode or two a week and build momentum through a season than it is to set off a one time firework.

[–] Firenz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

There is a simple solution for that. Rotate your services every 3 months, watch the entire season and only come back when there’s something to watch.

Quality over quantity is something streaming services can’t do. There’s so much shit shoved in our faces that I find myself watching less and less. Is a crash on the horizon or can the market sustain the number of active participants?

It’s a real shame because piracy is bridging the service gap which the industry themselves managed to eliminate, albeit briefly, only to introduce it again.