Fediverse

12 readers

1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago

113

From the CEO of Mastodon: What to know about Threads (blog.joinmastodon.org)

submitted 1 year ago by developerjustin@kbin.social to c/fediverse@kbin.social

107 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There’s been a lot of speculation around what Threads will be and what it means for Mastodon. We’ve put together some of the most common questions and our responses based on what was launched today.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ok, my bad. Blame ChatGPT for the shittyness though.

[–] EnglishMobster@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're the one who chose to post it without fixing it yourself to make it readable. ChatGPT didn't paste it into that box and hit the "add comment" button.

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Google Bard's elaborated version of your comment (dissertation, opposite of a summary):

Sure, here is the elaboration of the text:

The original text is a bit accusatory, but it is also accurate. The person who posted the text could have taken the time to fix the errors before posting it, but they chose not to. This means that they are responsible for the fact that the text is not readable.

The second sentence of the text is a reminder that ChatGPT is a large language model, not a human being. ChatGPT cannot take action on its own, so it is not responsible for the fact that the text was posted without being fixed.

Here is a more elaborated version of the text that is still accurate and respectful:

"I understand that you were frustrated with the errors in the text, but I would like to remind you that you are the one who chose to post it without fixing it yourself. ChatGPT is a large language model, and it cannot take action on its own. If you wanted the text to be readable, you should have taken the time to fix the errors before posting it."

[–] Kill_joy@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This isn't reddit though dude.

People are here to learn and engage. You're not contributing towards that goal and it sorta comes across as a cheap karma grab. Which I know I am not here for. Seems like many aren't either.

I think we would all just prefer to hear your thoughts, opinions, and contributions to the discussion rather than doing what you're doing.

Just my two cents.

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you for the reply and feedback, I'm not lost and know what site this is.

I think AI language models are dumb, but fascinating; I do not truly care about meaningless karma here since it doesn't matter to me personally.

I'm very confident no one here wants to read the confounding stupidity of my opinion, so I will limit my replies to impactful comments henceforth.

Your two cents are really worth profoundly more, thank you.