this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
42 points (88.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27027 readers
785 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The term is quite over used in my opinion, it is very often used in hyperbole. Whether it is in terms of popularity and driving traffic to a website or a threat said to break the Internet, it doesn't seem to live up to the meaning of the term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee -3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Did no one before that look at the schema and question the use of a signed int for a counter? That’s just bad design.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"No way a video gets more than 2 billion likes... "

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It was a fairly reasonable guess back when they designed it, especially since you need an account to like a video.

That would mean close to 1/3 (~33%) of the world's population "like"d the video.

Nowadays it's only about 1/4 of the world's population (25% for those who don't get fractions).

It'd take massive amounts of bots to like a video that many times, and what would be the point?

Of course, they probably never imagined they'd scale quite this much.

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

It wasn't the like counter they needed to change. It was the view counter.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 8 points 9 months ago

I mean, yeah, it is a bad design but you have to remember that YouTube wasn't always a Google owned service, this sounds exactly like the kind of thing that gets overlooked in a hobby project because no video ever will have more than 2 billion views, right?

So yeah, bad design but really easy to forget about for a video view counter.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The guy who made that code is probably loooong gone to another job. And it worked before.