this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
646 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2400 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I assume most are for rescheduling, or respecting state's choice, or maybe they're more concerned with systemic inequality and foreign genocide with US armaments.

Also, though, the Biden Administration has been pushing for the DEA to reschedule marijuana for like 3 years...

[–] Anomaline@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

more concerned with systemic inequality and foreign genocide

...what in this prevents them from doing their job and actually forwarding a pretty objectively good bill?

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't you see? They must only think about one issue at a time!

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -5 points 9 months ago

Unironically, yes. They can't be doing everything all at once when it takes their full power to even force topics to be discussed on the senate floor and write proposals. Every second that Bernie Sanders talks about weed, for example, would stop him from putting up pictures of Palestinian children begging for water.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -4 points 9 months ago

Their time? What do you think the senate is, they all just say whatever is on their mind and everybody votes for or against it on the spot?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

or respecting state’s choice

I'd love to hear the logic of how federal descheduling takes away a states choice...

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The states have demonstrably had the choice to decriminalize Marijuana since 1973, not doing so by now can be seen as their choice to keep it a restricted substance.

EDIT: To be clear, I'm explaining their thoughts on the subject, not agreeing with them.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If a state has zero laws about cannabis federal schedule makes it illegal

And many of the states that haven't legalized use the federal schedule as rational.to not legalize.

If they want them illegal, they can pass a law making them illegal. That's how it's supposed to be work.

Not states having to legalize something on a state level because the federal government claims it's one of the most dangerous drugs in the country, but won't actually enforce people flagrantly breaking the law...

Have you ever tried reading anything about this? Like, ever?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

He said "decriminalize", not "legalize".

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today -2 points 9 months ago

No, clearly I've never read anything ever, and in fact that 1973 date I gave in the previous comment was a random guess. /Very-Big-Sarcasm

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Descheduling is respecting the states' choices. Legalization at the national level doesn't automatically make it legal in states.