this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
1460 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2746 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The world has experienced its hottest day on record, according to meteorologists.

The average global temperature reached 17.01C (62.62F) on Monday, according to the US National Centres for Environmental Prediction.

The figure surpasses the previous record of 16.92C (62.46F) - set back in August 2016.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net 76 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Im just glad it's shaping up to be so apocalyptic that there'll be no safe haven for the owner class that caused it. Let them burn with the peasants they decimated for profit.

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And that's why the billionaires are investing in spaceships... Seriously though, they are really buying "doomsday" properties to ride it out.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems pathetic to me that people are so obsessed with self-centered “survival” at any cost. I don’t want to live in a bunker or a ruined world, and I couldn’t possibly care less about “my lineage” or genetic material or whatever.

[–] Lzwzli@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you care about human survival but not about your own survival?!

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

well, that's not precisely what I meant, but sure. I would much rather not see humanity reduced to apocalyptic conditions at all. But if that was to happen, I'd not want to live in a bunker or in space and I'd feel bad for people who did. I also mean that I'm not concerned with "I and my offspring must survive into the future" the way some people are. I don't have any kids... that might change things.

[–] suspecm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Love that they are spending billions on bunkers to "ride it out", when the moment they need to use the bunker, there is nothing to ride out, we are not coming back to the surface in the next few lifetimes if ever.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

those who go to those bunkers might have a chance to survive and essentially be what will be left of humans if it gets so bad surface becomes completely hostile for life. If its those fucking shits that are partly responsible for all this, they will make humanity into mockery of what its now. But its also likely they just made "luxury bunkers" that are nice to live in but that cant actually support people as long as its needed.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Those bunkers are luxury tombs and little else.

Yup, I'm sure their grandchildren will get all the warm fuzzies growing up in a confined bunker with picture book after picture book of the blue skies, green landscapes, and animals that their grandparents helped destroy.

[–] CrackaJack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That explains a lot with billionaire space race.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The COVID pandemic makes me their plan is to turn New Zealand into a bunker nation and leave us all to die.

[–] MrTulip@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like, just the billionaires on an island? Who will do all the labor required to maintain their lifestyle? Because they sure as he'll aren't. To paraphrase Pratchett, it takes a hundred people standing in the mud to keep one person with their head in the clouds.

[–] gorgor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who is this Pratchett character? Sounds like a righteous bloke lol

[–] MrTulip@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Terry Pratchett, author best known for the Discworld series of novels.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There's an island full of laborers already in New Zealand. The COVID response showed that they were willing to protect people already living there, so their response to climate change will be the same.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think that if they manage to fuck over the whole world, there is no amount of money and bunkers that can save them from the angry mob

[–] BillyZane@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Watch the show Silo. They’ll find a way. The books are good too.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There is no such thing as a semtex-proof bunker.

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eh, ring of fire will get them

[–] queermunist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Probably.

Billionaires seem to think nature is irrelevant. See: Elon Musk and his Mars fetish lol

[–] MrsDoyle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This exactly. One of the reasons I left NZ was a fear of earthquakes. My dozen Christchurch rellies all living in the least damaged house, with a bucket in the garage as their toilet, just confirmed for me that I'd made the right choice.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Too bad the security they will hire to keep their bunkers safe will quickly figure out that the money they are being paid isn't worth anything any more... they will probably point us over to the air vents when we show up with the cement trucks.

[–] AnthonyStark@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The ones responsible will be gone by the time the worst effects will be felt. Sins of the father?

[–] AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not the descendants that accepted and kept their family's blood money without a second thought. The moment you, as an autonomous adult, choose to accept the power and wealth reaped through human misery, you accept the legacy of blood that came with it.

Anyone can walk away from blood money, or use ALL that blood money solely to provide restitution to the populations exploitated to obtain it. It doesn't happen though, because human beings as a rule are the fucking worst. Most people, the fuckees, fantasize about becoming the oligarch fuckers, instead of dreaming of ending their oppression and restructuring society to prohibit amoral levels of wealth/power accumulation. Most humans, given power/wealth, would use their own suffering as an excuse to propagate more suffering.

[–] HandOfDoom@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Very true. I have an example in my family: my father-in-law owns a lot of land. That land, not so long ago, belonged to some native tribes that were all killed to have said land stolen. My wife said that, when her father dies and she inherits the land/money, she's gonna donate most of it (maybe all, depending on our financial situation), because she doesn't want the blood money.

Every time I (proudly) tell this to someone, they look at me like I'm crazy.

[–] AnthonyStark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Playing devil's advocate here: do you live in the US or UK?

[–] AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net 2 points 1 year ago

The US, not proud of it at all though, and would leave if I had an in pretty much anywhere in Europe or Canada.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

And this is true

[–] DFTBA_FTW@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly one of the reasons that longevity treatments could actually turn out to be a good thing.

All of a sudden a bunch of rich fucks who were sooo sure that climate change wouldn't effect them but rather their great great grandkids have a good reason to pour a lot of money into the problem so they don't die of heat or starvation at the young age of 150 when they could have lived 200? 300? Who knows, at a certain point you get a longevity tech run away effect.