this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
846 points (89.3% liked)

Political Memes

5494 readers
2298 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (74 children)

Well there's the time he lobbied Congress to take away the rights of striking railway workers.

And then there's the fact that he circumvented normal procedures to expedite weapons sales to Israel twice in December alone.

That's just two of many examples of him being on the side of the rich and powerful and against regular people every time there's conflict between the two groups.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (13 children)

How dare he… checks notes… prevent a national financial crisis but still worked to get the unions everything they wanted, and stand by our international allies in a crisis even when Congress won't.

I guess you'd prefer a reality where he takes the fall for the consequences of the strike, Republicans win, and Israel is thrown under the bus, providing an example to our other allies that we will do the same to them as soon as it's politically convenient. Brilliant politics.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

undermining the autonomy of workers to choose to strike is bad.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

What are you, some kinda big mouth Co- . . . oh . . . . sorry. Carry on.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You said he got the unions "everything they wanted". They wanted 15 sick days so I'll wait for you to post a source saying every rail worker in all 12 unions now has 15 sick days. Or you can admit saying he got them "everything they wanted" is a lie.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Those striking railway workers eventually got their demands for sick leave met in their contracts with continued support from the Biden Administration AND our national economy didn't grind to a halt

"We’re thankful that the Biden administration played the long game on sick days and stuck with us for months after Congress imposed our updated national agreement,” Russo said. “Without making a big show of it, Joe Biden and members of his administration in the Transportation and Labor departments have been working continuously to get guaranteed paid sick days for all railroad workers.

Source: https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I'm not really sure that's the point. The fact that the only changes that are allowed to get through are what the president allows is disheartening. The fact is, these workers should have been able to strike on their own terms without being shut down. What happens with a more hostile leader? What Biden did was defang the Union in that instance. Threw them a bone afterward, sure, but he defanged them.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Without making a big show of it

That's how Biden works! The corporate media is against Biden and it shows to those who can see. It's tough getting the real news and that's a massive problem for this country.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They got a fraction of what they were asking for and they weren't even asking for much. Their working conditions are still so awful that it's only a question of time before the next major derailment disaster like the one in Ohio happens.

Next time, it might happen in a major metropolitan area, in which case many will die and the economy will suffer a lot worse than not trampling on their rights would have.

And even the tiny concessions they DID get in spite of Biden convincing congress to make them fight oligarchic railway companies without their best weapon, strike actions, was due to NLRB efforts with no help from Corporate Joe.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The strike threat was about paid sick leave, it wasn't about railroad safety. Safety is an important issue too, but every single source from the time, even directly from the unions, explicitly discussed only paid sick leave. In that sense they got their demand met completely

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It was about sick leave and improving the working conditions that are so awful that they're literally making workers sick and trains less safe.

every single source from the time, even directly from the unions, explicitly discussed only paid sick leave

That's simply not true. That's the MSM and party narrative, but it isn't the truth. Outlets less intertwined with the political establishment such as The Intercept and The Nation could have informed you better, had you bothered to look beyond the bubble.

in that sense they got their demand met completely

You mean in that entirely fictional sense? To quote the Nation piece:

this was never just a conflict over the number of paid sick days. About 115,000 workers represented by 13 separate craft unions, who keep 40 percent of the nation’s freight moving, got screwed. The coalition of interests that did the screwing includes: the executive boards of the seven class-1 carriers, most of Congress, and the president.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I love that railroad Striker story because it just makes identifying people online so easy. Because whenever people online complain about it it's either one or two things, it's either they're completely ignorant of this actual scenario and what actually happened or they're just being intellectually dishonest on purpose.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

false dichotomy: i support the freedom to strike and anyone who challenges it is a class enemy

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (71 replies)