Selfhosted

40382 readers

462 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

[K8S] nfs and mounting problems (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by Burn1ngBull3t@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello !

I currently have a problem on my kubernetes cluster.

I have 3 nodes:

192.168.0.16
192.168.0.65
192.168.0.55

I use a storage class nfs (sigs/nfs-subdir-external-provisioner) to use an NFS.

The NFS is actually set up on the 192.168.0.55 which is also a worker node then.

I noticed that i have problems mounting volumes when a pod is created on the 192.168.0.55 node. If its one of the other two, it mounts. (The error is actually a permission denied on the 192.168.0.55 node)

I would guess that something goes wrong when kube tries to mount to NFS since it’s on the same machine ?

Any idea on how i can fix this? Cheers !

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Burn1ngBull3t@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hello @theit8514

You are actually spot on ^^

I did look in my exports file which was like so :/mnt/DiskArray 192.168.0.16(rw) 192.168.0.65(rw)

I added a localhost line in case: /mnt/DiskArray 127.0.0.1(rw) 192.168.0.16(rw) 192.168.0.65(rw)

It didn't solve the problem. I went to investigate with the mount command:

Will mount on 192.168.0.65: mount -t nfs 192.168.0.55:/mnt/DiskArray/mystuff/ /tmp/test
Will NOT mount on 192.168.0.55 (NAS): mount -t nfs 192.168.0.55:/mnt/DiskArray/mystuff/ /tmp/test
Will mount on 192.168.0.55 (NAS): mount -t nfs 127.0.0.1:/mnt/DiskArray/mystuff/ /tmp/test

The mount -t nfs 192.168.0.55 is the one that the cluster does actually. So i either need to find a way for it to use 127.0.0.1 on the NAS machine, or use a hostname that might be better to resolve

EDIT:

I was acutally WAY simpler.

I just added 192.168.0.55 to my /etc/exports file. It works fine now ^^

Thanks a lot for your help@theit8514@lemmy.world !