17
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
17 points (87.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
9444 readers
488 users here now
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I doubt very much they would agree with their characterization as sadists, but I also doubt they would be willing to pay for perpetual-upkeep progesterone, (or whatever the animal equivalent might be) for their animal children. It's a wonderful intersection of convenient and cheap, and because animals are defined as being unable to consent (without the restrictions that would normally impose on a human subject), you don't have to worry about pesky things like morality or ethical restrictions. By grabthar's hammer, what a savings.
I see you've never met a cat before
That would be a masochist, but yes, cats are notorious sadists.