submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/sysadmin@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Debian has less complexityand is very stable. It has a nice wiki and a Debian system can run for a few years on unattended upgrades.

Edit: this post was originally about cost savings but that is not really a useful metric

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 years ago

I wouldn't even deploy Arch in production as its not designed to be stable.

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I mean you'd have to be pretty insane to use Arch on an actual server.

That or a masochist.

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024

10 points (72.7% liked)

Sysadmin

15087 readers

1 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS