148
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
148 points (83.3% liked)
News
39254 readers
2013 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
"Biden considers vague unspecified action on a subject that over 70% of the American electorate considers a problem, clearly Both Sides are Just As Bad"
What? That's not a quote from the article. What are the sides you're even talking about? The borders sides?
By... acknowledging that action in a democracy happens by consensus of the voters?
Tell me, how do YOU think decisions should be made? Who's your autocrat of choice, here, since democracy is apparently unacceptable?
Answer me: If 70% of the population believed we LGBTQ+ people should be put to death, then you'd think that's alright?
That's what you're doing here, but with immigrants. The real problem is you don't see immigrants as humans. Their lives are expendable to people like you.
Ignoring that unspecified action on 'securing the border' and putting LGBTQ people to death aren't even in the same conceptual ballpark, if 70% of the population believed that LGBTQ folk should be put to death, then it's pretty clearly a losing plank to run on in a democracy.
So tell me - if 70% of the population thought that LGBTQ folk should be put to death, would you say "Let the guy who wants to genocide non-whites AND LGBTQ people win! Both sides are the same!" like you are now?
"Securing the border" is just political speak for trampling on the rights and dignity of immigrants. Again, I'm not that naive to be deceived by this crap. I'm way too old and have seen too many lies from politicians.
And I don't compromise and barter with innocent lives. I'm not that shitty of a human.
lmao
You think that's funny. Yikes.
Trump will put way more innocent lives at risk, so you are doing exactly what you're saying tou would never do by putting your vote for Biden on the table.
That's what's funny.
So I should vote for someone who's actively causing harm and whose supporters see this as acceptable (at least 70% according to that Pug person)? That's the best our system can do? What a fucked up system
I consider it a problem and I consider abolishing the border a solution.
We are not the same.